Literature DB >> 9493542

Accuracy of intraoperative assessment of acetabular prosthesis placement.

D M Hassan1, G H Johnston, W N Dust, G Watson, A T Dolovich.   

Abstract

Anteversion and vertical tilt of the acetabular prostheses in 50 consecutive total hip arthroplasties were prospectively evaluated during surgery (by the surgeon, using an alignment guide) and radiographically (calculated). From postoperative standardized radiographs vertical tilt was measured directly and anteversion was calculated. The mean error of vertical tilt was 5 degrees (range, 0 degrees - 20 degrees). The mean error of version was 9 degrees (range, 0 degrees - 24 degrees). The reliability of prosthesis placement in a predetermined zone was examined. Although the surgeons believed that all 50 cups were inside this zone, radiographic measurements revealed that 21 of the cups were actually outside. It is concluded that vertical tilt can be reasonably assessed during surgery. Anteversion, however, cannot be accurately assessed during surgery, despite use of the alignment guide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9493542     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(98)90079-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  32 in total

1.  [CT-free image guided acetabulum navigation in clinical routine].

Authors:  J Von Recum; K Wendl; J Korber; A Wentzensen; P A Grützner
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Intraoperative radiographs for placing acetabular components in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas P Gross; Fei Liu; Lee Webb
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Acetabular component positioning using anatomic landmarks of the acetabulum.

Authors:  Yong-Chan Ha; Jeong Joon Yoo; Young-Kyun Lee; Jin Young Kim; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  How does pelvic rotation or tilt affect radiographic measurement of acetabular component inclination angle during THA?

Authors:  Chris R Mellano; Andrew I Spitzer
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-06-23

5.  Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional acetabular cup placement in THA: a matched-pair controlled study.

Authors:  Benjamin G Domb; Youssef F El Bitar; Adam Y Sadik; Christine E Stake; Itamar B Botser
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Development of imageless computer navigation for acetabular component position in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Lawrence D Dorr; Yuji Hishiki; Zhinian Wan; Deanne Newton; Andrew Yun
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2005

7.  Greater accuracy in positioning of the acetabular cup by using an image-free navigation system.

Authors:  T Kalteis; M Handel; T Herold; L Perlick; H Baethis; J Grifka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  ACETABULAR COMPONENT ORIENTATION IN TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY: THE ROLE OF ACETABULAR TRANSVERSE LIGAMENT.

Authors:  Mohammed El Idrissi; Abdelhalim Elibrahimi; Mohammed Shimi; Abdelmajid Elmrini
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.513

Review 9.  Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery -- CAOS.

Authors:  Enes M Kanlić; Fabian Delarosa; Miguel Pirela-Cruz
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.363

10.  A novel non-invasive mechanical technique of cup and stem placement and leg length adjustment in total hip arthroplasty for dysplastic hips.

Authors:  Takashi Murayama; Hideo Ohnishi; Toshiharu Mori; Yuichi Okazaki; Kenji Sujita; Akinori Sakai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.