Literature DB >> 19603885

Sequential stream segregation using temporal periodicity cues in cochlear implant recipients.

Robert S Hong1, Christopher W Turner.   

Abstract

Sequential stream segregation involves the ability of a listener to perceptually segregate two rapidly alternating sounds into different perceptual streams. By studying auditory streaming in cochlear implants (CIs), one can obtain a better understanding of the cues that CI recipients can use to segregate different sound sources, which may have relevance to such everyday activities as the understanding of speech in background noise. This study focuses on the ability of CI users to use temporal periodicity cues to perform auditory stream segregation. A rhythmic discrimination task involving sequences of alternating amplitude-modulated (AM) noises is used. The results suggest that most CI users can stream AM noise bursts at relatively low modulation frequencies (near 80 Hz AM), but that this ability diminishes at higher modulation frequencies. Additionally, the ability of CI users to perform streaming using temporal periodicity cues appears to be comparable to that of normal-hearing listeners. These results imply that CI subjects may in certain contexts (i.e., when the talker has a low fundamental frequency voice) be able to use temporal periodicity cues to segregate and thus understand the voices of competing talkers.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19603885      PMCID: PMC2723898          DOI: 10.1121/1.3140592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  30 in total

1.  Coding of the fundamental frequency in continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implants.

Authors:  L Geurts; J Wouters
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Adaptive procedures in psychophysical research.

Authors:  M R Leek
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

3.  Auditory stream segregation on the basis of amplitude-modulation rate.

Authors:  Nicolas Grimault; Sid P Bacon; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of differences in timbre on sequential grouping.

Authors:  R Cusack; B Roberts
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-07

5.  Temporal pitch in electric hearing.

Authors:  Fan Gang Zeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 6.  Processing speed and timing in aging adults: psychoacoustics, speech perception, and comprehension.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pickora-Fuller
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Sequential streaming and effective level differences due to phase-spectrum manipulations.

Authors:  Thomas H Stainsby; Brian C J Moore; Peter J Medland; Brian R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Stream segregation and the illusion of overlap.

Authors:  G L Dannenbring; A S Bregman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Streaming of vowel sequences based on fundamental frequency in a cochlear-implant simulation.

Authors:  Etienne Gaudrain; Nicolas Grimault; Eric W Healy; Jean-Christophe Béra
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Primitive stream segregation of tone sequences without differences in fundamental frequency or passband.

Authors:  Brian Roberts; Brian R Glasberg; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  19 in total

1.  Influence of pitch, timbre and timing cues on melodic contour identification with a competing masker (L).

Authors:  Meimei Zhu; Bing Chen; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Simultaneous grouping in cochlear implant listeners: can abrupt changes in level be used to segregate components from a complex tone?

Authors:  Huw R Cooper; Brian Roberts
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-10-14

3.  Effect of Dual-Carrier Processing on the Intelligibility of Concurrent Vocoded Sentences.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Brittney L Carter; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Stream segregation on a single electrode as a function of pulse rate in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Sara I Duran; Leslie M Collins; Chandra S Throckmorton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Rate and onset cues can improve cochlear implant synthetic vowel recognition in noise.

Authors:  Myles Mc Laughlin; Richard B Reilly; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Asymmetric temporal envelope encoding: Implications for within- and across-ear envelope comparison.

Authors:  Sean R Anderson; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Auditory stream segregation of iterated rippled noises by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Daniel E Shearer; Michelle R Molis; Keri O Bennett; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Using Zebra-speech to study sequential and simultaneous speech segregation in a cochlear-implant simulation.

Authors:  Etienne Gaudrain; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Dichotic Listening Can Improve Perceived Clarity of Music in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Nicolas Vannson; Hamish Innes-Brown; Jeremy Marozeau
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Rapid Assessment of Non-Verbal Auditory Perception in Normal-Hearing Participants and Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Agathe Pralus; Ruben Hermann; Fanny Cholvy; Pierre-Emmanuel Aguera; Annie Moulin; Pascal Barone; Nicolas Grimault; Eric Truy; Barbara Tillmann; Anne Caclin
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.