Literature DB >> 19826870

Simultaneous grouping in cochlear implant listeners: can abrupt changes in level be used to segregate components from a complex tone?

Huw R Cooper1, Brian Roberts.   

Abstract

A sudden increase in the amplitude of a component often causes its segregation from a complex tone, and shorter rise times enhance this effect. We explored whether this also occurs in implant listeners (n = 8). Condition 1 used a 3.5-s "complex tone" comprising concurrent stimulation on five electrodes distributed across the array of the Nucleus CI24 implant. For each listener, the baseline stimulus level on each electrode was set at 50% of the dynamic range (DR). Two 1-s increments of 12.5%, 25%, or 50% DR were introduced in succession on adjacent electrodes within the "inner" three of those activated. Both increments had rise and fall times of 30 and 970 ms or vice versa. Listeners reported which increment was higher in pitch. Some listeners performed above chance for all increment sizes, but only for 50% increments did all listeners perform above chance. No significant effect of rise time was found. Condition 2 replaced amplitude increments with decrements. Only three listeners performed above chance even for 50% decrements. One exceptional listener performed well for 50% decrements with fall and rise times of 970 and 30 ms but around chance for fall and rise times of 30 and 970 ms, indicating successful discrimination based on a sudden rise back to baseline stimulation. Overall, the results suggest that implant listeners can use amplitude changes against a constant background to pick out components from a complex, but generally these must be large compared with those required in normal hearing. For increments, performance depended mainly on above-baseline stimulation of the target electrodes, not rise time. With one exception, performance for decrements was typically very poor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19826870      PMCID: PMC2820213          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-009-0190-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  21 in total

1.  Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Peggy B Nelson; Su-Hyun Jin; Arlene Earley Carney; David A Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Simulations of cochlear implant hearing using filtered harmonic complexes: implications for concurrent sound segregation.

Authors:  John M Deeks; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  The influence of extraneous sounds on the perceptual estimation of first-formant frequency in vowels.

Authors:  B Roberts; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Pitch as a medium: a new approach to psychophysical scaling.

Authors:  F Attneave; R K Olson
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1971-06

6.  The role of resolved and unresolved harmonics in pitch perception and frequency modulation discrimination.

Authors:  T M Shackleton; R P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Resetting the pitch-analysis system: 1. Effects of rise times of tones in noise backgrounds or of harmonics in a complex tone.

Authors:  A S Bregman; P Ahad; J Kim; L Melnerich
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-08

8.  Resetting the pitch-analysis system. 2. Role of sudden onsets and offsets in the perception of individual components in a cluster of overlapping tones.

Authors:  A S Bregman; P A Ahad; J Kim
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Perceiving vowels in the presence of another sound: constraints on formant perception.

Authors:  C J Darwin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 10.  Music perception with cochlear implants: a review.

Authors:  Hugh J McDermott
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004
View more
  1 in total

1.  The effect of visual cues on auditory stream segregation in musicians and non-musicians.

Authors:  Jeremy Marozeau; Hamish Innes-Brown; David B Grayden; Anthony N Burkitt; Peter J Blamey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.