Literature DB >> 10997053

Effects of differences in timbre on sequential grouping.

R Cusack1, B Roberts.   

Abstract

Differences in the timbre of sounds in a sequence can affect their perceptual organization. Using a performance measure, Hartmann and Johnson (1991) concluded that streaming could be predicted primarily by the extent to which sounds were passed by different peripheral channels. However, results from a rating task by Dannenbring and Bregman (1976) suggested that sounds in the same spectral region (passed by the same peripheral channels) can be allocated to different streams. In Experiment 1, it was found, using an interleaved melody task, that target sounds could be selected from distractors in the same spectral region more easily when they differed in timbre. This finding might result from primitive stream segregation or schema-driven selection, but not from peripheral channeling. In Experiment 2, a rhythm discrimination task was used, requiring the sounds to be integrated for good performance. Differences in timbre impaired performance, indicating the occurrence of primitive stream segregation.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10997053     DOI: 10.3758/bf03212092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  25 in total

1.  Toward an objective measure for a "stream segregation" task.

Authors:  Virginia M Richards; Eva Maria Carreira; Yi Shen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Conceptual and perceptual information both influence melody identification.

Authors:  Matthew D Schulkind
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-07

3.  Neuromagnetic correlates of streaming in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Alexander Gutschalk; Christophe Micheyl; Jennifer R Melcher; André Rupp; Michael Scherg; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Sequential stream segregation using temporal periodicity cues in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Robert S Hong; Christopher W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Perceptual organization and stability of auditory streaming for pure tones and /ba/ stimuli.

Authors:  Samantha J Gustafson; John Grose; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Cortical and Sensory Causes of Individual Differences in Selective Attention Ability Among Listeners With Normal Hearing Thresholds.

Authors:  Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Cognitive resources are distributed among the entire auditory landscape in auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Renee M Symonds; Juin W Zhou; Sally L Cole; Kelin M Brace; Elyse S Sussman
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  The effect of lip-reading on primary stream segregation.

Authors:  Aymeric Devergie; Nicolas Grimault; Etienne Gaudrain; Eric W Healy; Frédéric Berthommier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Competing streams at the cocktail party: exploring the mechanisms of attention and temporal integration.

Authors:  Juanjuan Xiang; Jonathan Simon; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  The cocktail party problem: what is it? How can it be solved? And why should animal behaviorists study it?

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.231

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.