Literature DB >> 25712864

Promising Mid-term Results With a Cup-cage Construct for Large Acetabular Defects and Pelvic Discontinuity.

Tomas Amenabar1,2, Wael A Rahman3, Bandar M Hetaimish3, Paul R Kuzyk4, Oleg A Safir4, Allan E Gross4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Restoring normal anatomy and achieving stable fixation of the acetabular component can be especially challenging when the surgeon must deal with severe acetabular defects and/or pelvic discontinuity. The cup-cage (CC) construct, where an ilioischial cage is cemented within a biologically fixed porous metal cup, has emerged as an excellent option to treat such challenges. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We sought to determine (1) mid-term Kaplan-Meier survival; (2) clinical outcomes based on Merle d'Aubigné-Postel scores; (3) radiological outcomes based primarily on construct migration; and (4) the complication rate for a series of 67 CC procedures performed at our institution.
METHODS: All hip revision procedures between January 2003 and March 2012 where a CC was used (with the exception of tumor cases or acute fracture; four total cases) that had a minimum 2-year followup and that had been seen within the last 2 years were included in this retrospective review. Acetabular bone loss and presence of pelvic discontinuity were assessed according to the Gross classification. Sixty-seven CC procedures with an average followup of 74 months (range, 24-135 months; SD, 34.3) months were identified; 26 of 67 (39%) were Gross Type IV and 41 of 67 (61%) were Gross Type V (pelvic discontinuity). Postoperative clinical and radiological evaluation was done annually. Merle d'Aubigné-Postel scores were recorded and all radiographs were compared with the 6-week postoperative radiographs to evaluate for radiographic loosening or migration. Failure was defined as revision surgery for any cause, including infection.
RESULTS: The 5-year Kaplan-Meier survival rate with revision for any cause representing failure was 93% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83.1-97.4), and the 10-year survival rate was 85% (95% CI, 67.2-93.8). The Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score improved significantly from a mean of 6 preoperatively to 13 postoperatively (p < 0.001). Four CC had nonprogressive radiological migration of the ischial flange and they remain stable.
CONCLUSIONS: We believe that the CC construct is a suitable choice to treat chronic pelvic discontinuity; it also remains a reliable option for the treatment of severe acetabular bone defects if stable fixation cannot be obtained through the use of a trabecular metal cup with or without augments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 25712864      PMCID: PMC4709326          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-015-4210-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  29 in total

1.  Revision total hip arthroplasty with the use of structural acetabular allograft and reconstruction ring: a case series with a 10-year average follow-up.

Authors:  K J Saleh; G Jaroszynski; I Woodgate; L Saleh; A E Gross
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Fibrous tissue ingrowth and attachment to porous tantalum.

Authors:  S A Hacking; J D Bobyn; K Toh; M Tanzer; J J Krygier
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2000-12-15

3.  Reliability and intraoperative validity of preoperative assessment of standardized plain radiographs in predicting bone loss at revision hip surgery.

Authors:  K J Saleh; J Holtzman; A Gafni; L Saleh; A Davis; S Resig; A E Gross
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Reconstruction of segmental defects during revision procedures of the acetabulum with the Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage.

Authors:  C Perka; R Ludwig
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 5.  A porous tantalum trabecular metal: basic science.

Authors:  Robert Cohen
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2002-04

6.  Complications of ilioischial reconstruction rings in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Stuart Goodman; Hillary Saastamoinen; Nadav Shasha; Allan Gross
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Cementless acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Craig J Della Valle; Richard A Berger; Aaron G Rosenberg; Jorge O Galante
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Evaluation of cementless acetabular component migration. An experimental study.

Authors:  P Massin; L Schmidt; C A Engh
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Pelvic discontinuity in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  D J Berry; D G Lewallen; A D Hanssen; M E Cabanela
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Trochanteric slide osteotomy in revision total hip arthroplasty for loosening.

Authors:  F Langlais; J C Lambotte; Ph Collin; F Langlois; J W Fontaine; H Thomazeau
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-05
View more
  22 in total

1.  CORR Insights(®): does cup-cage reconstruction with oversized cups provide initial stability in THA for osteoporotic acetabular fractures?

Authors:  Anton Y Plakseychuk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  [Treatment of acetabular defects with the trabecular metal revision system].

Authors:  G I Wassilew; V Janz; C Perka; M Müller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision.

Authors:  Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Acetabular reinforcement rings associated with allograft for severe acetabular defects.

Authors:  Emmanuel Gibon; Luc Kerboull; Jean-Pierre Courpied; Moussa Hamadouche
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Custom Acetabular Cages Offer Stable Fixation and Improved Hip Scores for Revision THA With Severe Bone Defects.

Authors:  Huiwu Li; Xinhua Qu; Yuanqing Mao; Kerong Dai; Zhenan Zhu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  CORR Insights®: Novel Acetabular Cup for Revision THA Improves Hip Center of Rotation: A Radiographic Evaluation.

Authors:  James A Keeney
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Treatment options for chronic pelvic discontinuity.

Authors:  Mark D Hasenauer; Wayne G Paprosky; Neil P Sheth
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-09-18

8.  Mid-term Results of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Modular Cementless Femoral Stems.

Authors:  Hyung-Gyu Jang; Kyung-Jae Lee; Byung-Woo Min; Hee-Uk Ye; Kyung-Hwan Lim
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2015-09-30

Review 9.  [Strategies for cup revision].

Authors:  Maik Stiehler; Klaus-Peter Günther; Jens Goronzy
Journal:  Orthopadie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-06-27

10.  Cup-cage construct for massive acetabular defect in revision hip arthroplasty- A case series with medium to long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Dan Arvinte; Manish Kiran; Manoj Sood
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-04-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.