Literature DB >> 10530861

Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial.

J D Bobyn1, G J Stackpool, S A Hacking, M Tanzer, J J Krygier.   

Abstract

We have studied the characteristics of bone ingrowth of a new porous tantalum biomaterial in a simple transcortical canine model using cylindrical implants 5 x 10 mm in size. The material was 75% to 80% porous by volume and had a repeating arrangement of slender interconnecting struts which formed a regular array of dodecahedron-shaped pores. We performed histological studies on two types of material, one with a smaller pore size averaging 430 microm at 4, 16 and 52 weeks and the other with a larger pore size averaging 650 microm at 2, 3, 4, 16 and 52 weeks. Mechanical push-out tests at 4 and 16 weeks were used to assess the shear strength of the bone-implant interface on implants of the smaller pore size. The extent of filling of the pores of the tantalum material with new bone increased from 13% at two weeks to between 42% and 53% at four weeks. By 16 and 52 weeks the average extent of bone ingrowth ranged from 63% to 80%. The tissue response to the small and large pore sizes was similar, with regions of contact between bone and implant increasing with time and with evidence of Haversian remodelling within the pores at later periods. Mechanical tests at four weeks indicated a minimum shear fixation strength of 18.5 MPa, substantially higher than has been obtained with other porous materials with less volumetric porosity. This porous tantalum biomaterial has desirable characteristics for bone ingrowth; further studies are warranted to ascertain its potential for clinical reconstructive orthopaedics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10530861     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.81b5.9283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  187 in total

1.  Enhancement of bonding strength by graded structure at interface between apatite layer and bioactive tantalum metal.

Authors:  T Miyazaki; H-M Kim; T Kokubo; C Ohtsuki; H Kato; T Nakamura
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Does using autograft bone chips achieve consistent bone ingrowth in primary TKA?

Authors:  Roy D Bloebaum; Karyn E Koller; Bettina M Willie; Aaron A Hofmann
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  New biomaterials for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Fabrizio Matassi; Lorenzo Nistri; Diana Chicon Paez; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2011-01

4.  Bone mineral density changes of the proximal tibia after revision total knee arthroplasty. A randomised study with the use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones.

Authors:  Claus L Jensen; Michael M Petersen; Henrik M Schrøder; Bjarne Lund
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Limb-sparing surgery using tantalum metal endoprosthesis in a dog with osteosarcoma of the distal radius.

Authors:  Tamara L MacDonald; Teresa D Schiller
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.008

6.  Cancellous bone osseointegration is enhanced by in vivo loading.

Authors:  Bettina M Willie; Xu Yang; Natalie H Kelly; Jane Han; Turya Nair; Timothy M Wright; Marjolein C H van der Meulen; Mathias P G Bostrom
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 3.056

7.  Clinical and radiological outcome of the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head using the osteonecrosis intervention implant.

Authors:  Thilo Floerkemeier; Fritz Thorey; Dorothea Daentzer; Matthias Lerch; Phillip Klages; Henning Windhagen; Gabriela von Lewinski
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Uncemented Porous Tantalum Acetabular Components: Early Follow-Up and Failures in 599 Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties.

Authors:  William J Long; Nicolas O Noiseux; Tad M Mabry; Arlen D Hanssen; David G Lewallen
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2015

9.  [Revision implants of the future: trends and new developments].

Authors:  S Winkler; F-X Köck; C Baier; H-R Springorum; A Beifuss; P Lechler; J Grifka; J Schaumburger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 10.  Nanoscale surface modifications of medically relevant metals: state-of-the art and perspectives.

Authors:  Fabio Variola; John B Brunski; Giovanna Orsini; Paulo Tambasco de Oliveira; Rima Wazen; Antonio Nanci
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 7.790

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.