Literature DB >> 25348836

Biological strategies for improved osseointegration and osteoinduction of porous metal orthopedic implants.

Eric Alexander Lewallen1, Scott M Riester, Carolina A Bonin, Hilal Maradit Kremers, Amel Dudakovic, Sanjeev Kakar, Robert C Cohen, Jennifer J Westendorf, David G Lewallen, Andre J van Wijnen.   

Abstract

The biological interface between an orthopedic implant and the surrounding host tissue may have a dramatic effect upon clinical outcome. Desired effects include bony ingrowth (osseointegration), stimulation of osteogenesis (osteoinduction), increased vascularization, and improved mechanical stability. Implant loosening, fibrous encapsulation, corrosion, infection, and inflammation, as well as physical mismatch may have deleterious clinical effects. This is particularly true of implants used in the reconstruction of load-bearing synovial joints such as the knee, hip, and the shoulder. The surfaces of orthopedic implants have evolved from solid-smooth to roughened-coarse and most recently, to porous in an effort to create a three-dimensional architecture for bone apposition and osseointegration. Total joint surgeries are increasingly performed in younger individuals with a longer life expectancy, and therefore, the postimplantation lifespan of devices must increase commensurately. This review discusses advancements in biomaterials science and cell-based therapies that may further improve orthopedic success rates. We focus on material and biological properties of orthopedic implants fabricated from porous metal and highlight some relevant developments in stem-cell research. We posit that the ideal primary and revision orthopedic load-bearing metal implants are highly porous and may be chemically modified to induce stem cell growth and osteogenic differentiation, while minimizing inflammation and infection. We conclude that integration of new biological, chemical, and mechanical methods is likely to yield more effective strategies to control and modify the implant-bone interface and thereby improve long-term clinical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25348836      PMCID: PMC4390115          DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2014.0333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev        ISSN: 1937-3368            Impact factor:   6.389


  124 in total

1.  Microstimulation at the bone-implant interface upregulates osteoclast activation pathways.

Authors:  Vincent A Stadelmann; Alexandre Terrier; Dominique P Pioletti
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Tantalum components in difficult acetabular revisions.

Authors:  Paul F Lachiewicz; Elizabeth S Soileau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Clinical application of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in orthopedics: focused versus unfocused shock waves.

Authors:  Casper Bindzus Foldager; Cathal Kearney; Myron Spector
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Bone grafting techniques in idiopathic scoliosis: a confirmation that allograft is as good as autograft but dispels the purported pain associated with the iliac crest bone graft harvest.

Authors:  John G Devine
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Sintered fiber metal composites as a basis for attachment of implants to bone.

Authors:  J Galante; W Rostoker; R Lueck; R D Ray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 6.  The history of biodegradable magnesium implants: a review.

Authors:  Frank Witte
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 8.947

7.  Therapy with autologous adipose-derived regenerative cells for the care of chronic ulcer of lower limbs in patients with peripheral arterial disease.

Authors:  Gerardo Marino; Marco Moraci; Emilia Armenia; Consiglia Orabona; Renato Sergio; Gabriele De Sena; Vincenza Capuozzo; Manlio Barbarisi; Francesco Rosso; Giovanni Giordano; Francesco Iovino; Alfonso Barbarisi
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  Donor-site morbidity after osteochondral autograft transfer procedures.

Authors:  Robert F LaPrade; Jesse C Botker
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Regional anatomic and age effects on cell function of human adipose-derived stem cells.

Authors:  Bret M Schipper; Kacey G Marra; Wei Zhang; Albert D Donnenberg; J Peter Rubin
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.539

Review 10.  The future of biologic coatings for orthopaedic implants.

Authors:  Stuart B Goodman; Zhenyu Yao; Michael Keeney; Fan Yang
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 12.479

View more
  26 in total

1.  Clinical Factors, Disease Parameters, and Molecular Therapies Affecting Osseointegration of Orthopedic Implants.

Authors:  Hilal Maradit Kremers; Eric A Lewallen; Andre J van Wijnen; David G Lewallen
Journal:  Curr Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2016-06-29

2.  Getting PEEK to Stick to Bone: The Development of Porous PEEK for Interbody Fusion Devices.

Authors:  F Brennan Torstrick; David L Safranski; J Kenneth Burkus; James L Chappuis; Christopher S D Lee; Robert E Guldberg; Ken Gall; Kathryn E Smith
Journal:  Tech Orthop       Date:  2017-09-01

3.  Do Surface Porosity and Pore Size Influence Mechanical Properties and Cellular Response to PEEK?

Authors:  F Brennan Torstrick; Nathan T Evans; Hazel Y Stevens; Ken Gall; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  [Compatibility and allergies of osteosynthesis materials].

Authors:  M Thomsen; P Thomas
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Surface topography of silicon nitride affects antimicrobial and osseointegrative properties of tibial implants in a murine model.

Authors:  Masahiro Ishikawa; Karen L de Mesy Bentley; Bryan J McEntire; B Sonny Bal; Edward M Schwarz; Chao Xie
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 4.396

6.  Osteogenic potential of human adipose-tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells cultured on 3D-printed porous structured titanium.

Authors:  Eric A Lewallen; Dakota L Jones; Amel Dudakovic; Roman Thaler; Christopher R Paradise; Hilal M Kremers; Matthew P Abdel; Sanjeev Kakar; Allan B Dietz; Robert C Cohen; David G Lewallen; Andre J van Wijnen
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 3.688

Review 7.  Multi-disciplinary antimicrobial strategies for improving orthopaedic implants to prevent prosthetic joint infections in hip and knee.

Authors:  Matthew A Getzlaf; Eric A Lewallen; Hilal M Kremers; Dakota L Jones; Carolina A Bonin; Amel Dudakovic; Roman Thaler; Robert C Cohen; David G Lewallen; Andre J van Wijnen
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Surface Roughness of Titanium Orthopedic Implants Alters the Biological Phenotype of Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells.

Authors:  Eric A Lewallen; William H Trousdale; Roman Thaler; Jie J Yao; Wei Xu; Janet M Denbeigh; Asha Nair; Jean-Pierre Kocher; Amel Dudakovic; Daniel J Berry; Robert C Cohen; Matthew P Abdel; David G Lewallen; Andre J van Wijnen
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 3.845

9.  3D printing of high-strength, porous, elastomeric structures to promote tissue integration of implants.

Authors:  Bijan Abar; Alejandro Alonso-Calleja; Alexander Kelly; Cambre Kelly; Ken Gall; Jennifer L West
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 4.396

10.  Postoperative Administration of Alpha-tocopherol Enhances Osseointegration of Stainless Steel Implants: An In Vivo Rat Model.

Authors:  Matthaios Savvidis; Kyriakos Papavasiliou; Ioannis Taitzoglou; Aggeliki Giannakopoulou; Dimitrios Kitridis; Nikiforos Galanis; Ioannis Vrabas; Eleftherios Tsiridis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.755

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.