Literature DB >> 17823035

The use of tantalum porous metal implants for Paprosky 3A and 3B defects.

Steven H Weeden1, Robert H Schmidt.   

Abstract

Complex acetabular defects are difficult to reconstruct. For severe pelvic defects, tantalum metal acetabular implants may provide a viable solution over traditional implants. This short-term follow-up reviews 43 acetabular revisions treated with tantalum acetabular implants. These revisions included 33 Paprosky type 3A defects, involving 30% to 50% of host acetabulum loss, and 10 type 3B defects, having similar or greater bone loss with a pelvic discontinuity. Tantulum acetabular modular augments were used in 26 cases to support the shell. At a mean of 2.8 years' follow-up, 42 components were stable, and 1 failed because of septic loosening. The overall success rate was 98%. One revision was performed because of loosening secondary to sepsis; none were performed for aseptic loosening. Implants made from highly porous tantalum metal provide a surface that is highly conducive to bone ingrowth. Combined with the ability to use modular augments for added support and stability, this technology may change the way major defects are reconstructed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17823035     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.04.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  48 in total

Review 1.  [What can be done when hip prostheses fail? : New trends in revision endoprosthetics].

Authors:  S Gravius; T Randau; D C Wirtz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Long-term results for minor column allografts in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Paul T H Lee; Guy Raz; Oleg A Safir; David J Backstein; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Uncemented Porous Tantalum Acetabular Components: Early Follow-Up and Failures in 599 Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties.

Authors:  William J Long; Nicolas O Noiseux; Tad M Mabry; Arlen D Hanssen; David G Lewallen
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2015

4.  Metropolitan and micropolitan statistical area estimates of depression and anxiety using the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 in the 2006 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Authors:  Tara W Strine; Satvinder S Dhingra; Kurt Kroenke; Mohamed Qayad; James L Ribble; Catherine A Okoro; Lina S Balluz; Shanta R Dube; James Lando; Ali H Mokdad
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.380

Review 5.  Properties of open-cell porous metals and alloys for orthopaedic applications.

Authors:  Gladius Lewis
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 6.  Systematic review on outcomes of acetabular revisions with highly-porous metals.

Authors:  Samik Banerjee; Kimona Issa; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Robert Pivec; Harpal S Khanuja; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Tantalum components in difficult acetabular revisions.

Authors:  Paul F Lachiewicz; Elizabeth S Soileau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  [Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision surgery of the hip. Autologous, homologous or metal?].

Authors:  S Gravius; G Pagenstert; O Weber; N Kraska; H Röhrig; D C Wirtz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Managing acetabular fractures in the elderly with fixation and primary arthroplasty: aiming for early weightbearing.

Authors:  Mark Rickman; James Young; Alex Trompeter; Rachel Pearce; Mark Hamilton
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT): the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine.

Authors:  Nicola J Farrer; Luca Salassa; Peter J Sadler
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 4.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.