Literature DB >> 19567945

Experimental characterization and system simulations of depth of interaction PET detectors using 0.5 mm and 0.7 mm LSO arrays.

Sara St James1, Yongfeng Yang, Yibao Wu, Richard Farrell, Purushottam Dokhale, Kanai S Shah, Simon R Cherry.   

Abstract

Small animal PET scanners may be improved by increasing the sensitivity, improving the spatial resolution and improving the uniformity of the spatial resolution across the field of view. This may be achieved by using PET detectors based on crystal elements that are thin in the axial and transaxial directions and long in the radial direction, and by employing depth of interaction (DOI) encoding to minimize the parallax error. With DOI detectors, the diameter of the ring of the PET scanner may also be decreased. This minimizes the number of detectors required to achieve the same solid angle coverage as a scanner with a larger ring diameter and minimizes errors due to non-collinearity of the annihilation photons. In this study, we characterize prototype PET detectors that are finely pixelated with individual LSO crystal element sizes of 0.5 mm x 0.5 mm x 20 mm and 0.7 mm x 0.7 mm x 20 mm, read out at both ends by position sensitive avalanche photodiodes (PSAPDs). Both a specular reflector and a diffuse reflector were evaluated. The detectors were characterized based on the ability to clearly resolve the individual crystal elements, the DOI resolution and the energy resolution. Our results indicate that a scanner based on any of the four detector designs would offer improved spatial resolution and more uniform spatial resolution compared to present day small animal PET scanners. The greatest improvements to spatial resolution will be achieved when the detectors employing the 0.5 mm x 0.5 mm x 20 mm crystals are used. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to demonstrate that 2 mm DOI resolution is adequate to ensure uniform spatial resolution for a small animal PET scanner geometry using these detectors. The sensitivity of such a scanner was also simulated using Monte Carlo simulations and was shown to be greater than 10% for a four ring scanner with an inner diameter of 6 cm, employing 20 detectors per scanner ring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19567945      PMCID: PMC2748915          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/14/015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  14 in total

1.  MicroPET II: design, development and initial performance of an improved microPET scanner for small-animal imaging.

Authors:  Yuan-Chuan Tai; Arion F Chatziioannou; Yongfeng Yang; Robert W Silverman; Ken Meadors; Stefan Siegel; Danny F Newport; Jennifer R Stickel; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-06-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  High-resolution PET detector design: modelling components of intrinsic spatial resolution.

Authors:  Jennifer R Stickel; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT.

Authors:  S Jan; G Santin; D Strul; S Staelens; K Assié; D Autret; S Avner; R Barbier; M Bardiès; P M Bloomfield; D Brasse; V Breton; P Bruyndonckx; I Buvat; A F Chatziioannou; Y Choi; Y H Chung; C Comtat; D Donnarieix; L Ferrer; S J Glick; C J Groiselle; D Guez; P F Honore; S Kerhoas-Cavata; A S Kirov; V Kohli; M Koole; M Krieguer; D J van der Laan; F Lamare; G Largeron; C Lartizien; D Lazaro; M C Maas; L Maigne; F Mayet; F Melot; C Merheb; E Pennacchio; J Perez; U Pietrzyk; F R Rannou; M Rey; D R Schaart; C R Schmidtlein; L Simon; T Y Song; J M Vieira; D Visvikis; R Van de Walle; E Wieërs; C Morel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Performance measurements of a depth-encoding PET detector module based on position-sensitive avalanche photodiode read-out.

Authors:  P A Dokhale; R W Silverman; K S Shah; R Grazioso; R Farrell; J Glodo; M A McClish; G Entine; V H Tran; S R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-09-21       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Depth of interaction resolution measurements for a high resolution PET detector using position sensitive avalanche photodiodes.

Authors:  Yongfeng Yang; Purushottam A Dokhale; Robert W Silverman; Kanai S Shah; Mickel A McClish; Richard Farrell; Gerald Entine; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Fabrication and characterization of a 0.5-mm lutetium oxyorthosilicate detector array for high-resolution PET applications.

Authors:  Jennifer R Stickel; Jinyi Qi; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Monolithic scintillator PET detectors with intrinsic depth-of-interaction correction.

Authors:  Marnix C Maas; Dennis R Schaart; D J Jan van der Laan; Peter Bruyndonckx; Cedric Lemaître; Freek J Beekman; Carel W E van Eijk
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  The design and physical characteristics of a small animal positron emission tomograph.

Authors:  P M Bloomfield; S Rajeswaran; T J Spinks; S P Hume; R Myers; S Ashworth; K M Clifford; W F Jones; L G Byars; J Young
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Radiation dose estimate in small animal SPECT and PET.

Authors:  Tobias Funk; Mingshan Sun; Bruce H Hasegawa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Monte Carlo simulations of absorbed dose in a mouse phantom from 18-fluorine compounds.

Authors:  Richard Taschereau; Arion F Chatziioannou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  15 in total

1.  A Prototype High-Resolution Small-Animal PET Scanner Dedicated to Mouse Brain Imaging.

Authors:  Yongfeng Yang; Julien Bec; Jian Zhou; Mengxi Zhang; Martin S Judenhofer; Xiaowei Bai; Kun Di; Yibao Wu; Mercedes Rodriguez; Purushottam Dokhale; Kanai S Shah; Richard Farrell; Jinyi Qi; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Simulation study of spatial resolution and sensitivity for the tapered depth of interaction PET detectors for small animal imaging.

Authors:  Sara St James; Yongfeng Yang; Spencer L Bowen; Jinyi Qi; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Performance of a high-resolution depth-encoding PET detector module using linearly-graded SiPM arrays.

Authors:  Junwei Du; Xiaowei Bai; Alberto Gola; Fabio Acerbi; Alessandro Ferri; Claudio Piemonte; Yongfeng Yang; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Fundamental Limits of Spatial Resolution in PET.

Authors:  William W Moses
Journal:  Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A       Date:  2011-08-21       Impact factor: 1.455

Review 5.  SPECT detectors: the Anger Camera and beyond.

Authors:  Todd E Peterson; Lars R Furenlid
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Tapered LSO arrays for small animal PET.

Authors:  Yongfeng Yang; Sara St James; Yibao Wu; Huini Du; Jinyi Qi; Richard Farrell; Purushottam A Dokhale; Kanai S Shah; Keith Vaigneur; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Pulse shape discrimination and classification methods for continuous depth of interaction encoding PET detectors.

Authors:  Emilie Roncali; Jennifer E Phipps; Laura Marcu; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Experimental evaluation of depth-of-interaction correction in a small-animal positron emission tomography scanner.

Authors:  Michael V Green; Harold G Ostrow; Jurgen Seidel; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.488

Review 9.  Application of silicon photomultipliers to positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Emilie Roncali; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  A Monte Carlo investigation of the spatial resolution performance of a small-animal PET scanner designed for mouse brain imaging studies.

Authors:  Mercedes Rodríguez-Villafuerte; Yongfeng Yang; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 2.685

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.