Literature DB >> 15487751

Radiation dose estimate in small animal SPECT and PET.

Tobias Funk1, Mingshan Sun, Bruce H Hasegawa.   

Abstract

Calculations of radiation dose are important in assessing the medical and biological implications of ionizing radiation in medical imaging techniques such as SPECT and PET. In contrast, radiation dose estimates of SPECT and PET imaging of small animals are not very well established. For that reason we have estimated the whole-body radiation dose to mice and rats for isotopes such as 18F, 99mTc, 201Tl, (111)In, 123I, and 125I that are used commonly for small animal imaging. We have approximated mouse and rat bodies with uniform soft tissue equivalent ellipsoids. The mouse and rat sized ellipsoids had a mass of 30 g and 300 g, respectively, and a ratio of the principal axes of 1:1:4 and 0.7:1:4. The absorbed fractions for various photon energies have been calculated using the Monte Carlo software package MCNP. Using these values, we then calculated MIRD S-values for two geometries that model the distribution of activity in the animal body: (a) a central point source and (b) a homogeneously distributed source, and compared these values against S-value calculations for small ellipsoids tabulated in MIRD Pamphlet 8 to validate our results. Finally we calculated the radiation dose taking into account the biological half-life of the radiopharmaceuticals and the amount of activity administered. Our calculations produced S-values between 1.06 x 10(-13) Gy/Bq s and 2.77 x 10(-13) Gy/Bq s for SPECT agents, and 15.0 x 10(-13) Gy/Bq s for the PET agent 18F, assuming mouse sized ellipsoids with uniform source distribution. The S-values for a central point source in an ellipsoid are about 10% higher than the values obtained for the uniform source distribution. Furthermore, the S-values for mouse sized ellipsoids are approximately 10 times higher than for the rat sized ellipsoids reflecting the difference in mass. We reviewed published data to obtain administered radioactivity and residence times for small animal imaging. From these values and our computed S-values we estimated that the whole body dose in small animals ranges between 6 cGy and 90 cGy for mice and between about 1 cGy and 27 cGy for rats. The whole body dose in small animal imaging can be very high in comparison to the lethal dose to mice (LD50/30 approximately 7 Gy). For this reason the dose in small animal imaging should be monitored carefully and the administered activity should be kept to a minimum. These results also underscore the need of further development of instrumentation that improves detection efficiency and reduces radiation dose in small animal imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15487751     DOI: 10.1118/1.1781553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  29 in total

1.  Chemoradionuclide therapy with 186re-labeled liposomal doxorubicin: toxicity, dosimetry, and therapeutic response.

Authors:  Anuradha Soundararajan; Ande Bao; William T Phillips; Linda M McManus; Beth A Goins
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.099

Review 2.  Instrumentation for molecular imaging in preclinical research: Micro-PET and Micro-SPECT.

Authors:  Arion F Chatziioannou
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2005

3.  Monte carlo simulations of dose from microCT imaging procedures in a realistic mouse phantom.

Authors:  Richard Taschereau; Patrick L Chow; Arion F Chatziioannou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Targeting murine heart and brain: visualisation conditions for multi-pinhole SPECT with (99m)Tc- and (123)I-labelled probes.

Authors:  M Pissarek; J Meyer-Kirchrath; T Hohlfeld; S Vollmar; A M Oros-Peusquens; U Flögel; C Jacoby; U Krügel; N Schramm
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Experimental characterization and system simulations of depth of interaction PET detectors using 0.5 mm and 0.7 mm LSO arrays.

Authors:  Sara St James; Yongfeng Yang; Yibao Wu; Richard Farrell; Purushottam Dokhale; Kanai S Shah; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Performance evaluation of PETbox: a low cost bench top preclinical PET scanner.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Qinan Bao; Nam T Vu; Robert W Silverman; Richard Taschereau; Brittany N Berry-Pusey; Ali Douraghy; Fernando R Rannou; David B Stout; Arion F Chatziioannou
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Simulation study of spatial resolution and sensitivity for the tapered depth of interaction PET detectors for small animal imaging.

Authors:  Sara St James; Yongfeng Yang; Spencer L Bowen; Jinyi Qi; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Performance Characteristics of BGO Detectors for a Low Cost Preclinical PET Scanner.

Authors:  H Zhang; N T Vu; Q Bao; R W Silverman; B N Berry-Pusey; A Douraghy; D A Williams; F R Rannou; D B Stout; A F Chatziioannou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 1.679

9.  Small animal absorbed radiation dose from serial micro-computed tomography imaging.

Authors:  Stephanie K Carlson; Kelly L Classic; Claire E Bender; Stephen J Russell
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  NEMA NU 2-2007 performance measurements of the Siemens Inveon preclinical small animal PET system.

Authors:  Brad J Kemp; Carrie B Hruska; Aaron R McFarland; Mark W Lenox; Val J Lowe
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.