Literature DB >> 19506866

The Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: 5-year clinical and radiographic results from a District General Hospital.

B Ollivere1, S Duckett, A August, M Porteous.   

Abstract

We prospectively examined the functional and radiographic outcomes of a serial cohort of 104 Birmingham Hip Resurfacings in an independent centre. Final follow-up was to a mean of 61 months, and six cases were lost to follow-up. Excellent results were obtained in 91%, but obese patients had significantly (p < 0.03) poorer post-operative outcomes. Whilst there were no cases of neck fracture neck narrowing of up to 20 mm was noted. Radiolucent lines were present in a single zone in 9.4% (9/96) acetabular and 3.1% (3/96) femoral components. However, no components were definitely loose and there were no revisions for any reason during the period of the study. This independent series confirms that the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing gives excellent early clinical results and little early evidence of radiographic failure. The high rate of neck narrowing gives us cause for concern and we would recommend regular radiographic follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19506866      PMCID: PMC2903169          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-009-0821-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  29 in total

1.  Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years.

Authors:  R B C Treacy; C W McBryde; P B Pynsent
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-02

2.  Biomechanical reconstruction of the hip: a randomised study comparing total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J Girard; M Lavigne; P-A Vendittoli; A G Roy
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-06

3.  The correlation between the roentgenographic appearance and operative findings at the bone-cement junction of the socket in Charnley low friction arthroplasties.

Authors:  J P Hodgkinson; P Shelley; B M Wroblewski
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation.

Authors:  W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Hip function after total vs. surface replacement.

Authors:  D R Gore; M P Murray; G M Gardner; S B Sepic
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1985-10

Review 6.  Metal on metal bearings in hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  H C Amstutz; P Grigoris
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip. Experience of the McMinn prothesis.

Authors:  D McMinn; R Treacy; K Lin; P Pynsent
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Cobalt toxicity after McKee hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  D A Jones; H K Lucas; M O'Driscoll; C H Price; B Wibberley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1975-08

9.  Wagner resurfacing hip arthroplasty. The results of one hundred consecutive arthroplasties after eight to ten years.

Authors:  D W Howie; D Campbell; M McGee; B L Cornish
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Preservation of the bone mineral density of the femur after surface replacement of the hip.

Authors:  Y Kishida; N Sugano; T Nishii; H Miki; K Yamaguchi; H Yoshikawa
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-03
View more
  16 in total

1.  Profunda femoris pseudoaneurysm following Birmingham hip resurfacing: an important differential diagnosis for a periarticular cystic mass.

Authors:  M S Thomas; J N O'Hara; A M Davies; Steven L J James
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Revision rate of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: comparison of published literature and arthroplasty register data.

Authors:  Reinhard Schuh; Daniel Neumann; Rauend Rauf; Jochen Hofstaetter; Nikolaus Boehler; Gerold Labek
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Bone mineral density in the femoral neck increases after hip resurfacing: a cohort with five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Charles A Willis-Owen; Henry D Atkinson; Roger D Oakeshott
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-08-22       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Survival of hard-on-hard bearings in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael G Zywiel; Siraj A Sayeed; Aaron J Johnson; Thomas P Schmalzried; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Indications and results of hip resurfacing.

Authors:  D J W McMinn; J Daniel; H Ziaee; C Pradhan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Hip resurfacing: a systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Régis Pailhé; Akash Sharma; Nicolas Reina; Etienne Cavaignac; Philippe Chiron; Jean-Michel Laffosse
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  [Results of 5 to 10-year follow-up after hip resurfacing. A systematic analysis of the literature on long-term results].

Authors:  M C M Klotz; S J Breusch; M Hassenpflug; R G Bitsch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Acetabular component thickness does not affect mid-term clinical results in hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Mariam Al-Hamad; Michel J Le Duff; Karren M Takamura; Harlan C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Hip resurfacing for rheumatoid arthritis: independent assessment of 11-year results from an international register.

Authors:  Tajeshwar S Aulakh; Jan H Kuiper; Josh Dixey; James B Richardson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 10.  Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: an analysis of safety and revision rates.

Authors:  S Sehatzadeh; K Kaulback; L Levin
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2012-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.