Literature DB >> 2355032

Wagner resurfacing hip arthroplasty. The results of one hundred consecutive arthroplasties after eight to ten years.

D W Howie1, D Campbell, M McGee, B L Cornish.   

Abstract

In a prospective study of 100 consecutive Wagner resurfacing hip arthroplasties in ninety-three patients, the outcomes for all hips were determined for an eight to ten-year follow-up period. By survivorship analysis, the rate of survival of the arthroplasty was calculated to be 70 per cent at five years, but only 40 per cent at eight years. The major cause of failure was aseptic loosening of the acetabular or femoral component, or both. Fracture of the neck of the femur occurred in three hips. Although the medium-term results (at fifty-six to eighty-three months) were better than those in most comparable studies of resurfacing arthroplasty, the poor long-term results (at ninety-one to 118 months) show that meaningful studies of new prosthetic designs must continue for at least eight years, and, if at all possible, must include 100 per cent follow-up. The survival curve for the resurfacing arthroplasties in this study can serve as the basis for comparison of the early, medium, and long-term results of future designs of resurfacing hip prostheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2355032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  16 in total

Review 1.  Hip resurfacing: a technology reborn.

Authors:  Steven Cutts; Paul B Carter
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Computer-assisted placement technique in hip resurfacing arthroplasty: improvement in accuracy?

Authors:  S Krüger; P Y Zambelli; P-F Leyvraz; B M Jolles
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: 5-year clinical and radiographic results from a District General Hospital.

Authors:  B Ollivere; S Duckett; A August; M Porteous
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The minimally invasive anterolateral approach combined with hip onlay resurfacing.

Authors:  Ludger Gerdesmeyer; Hans Gollwitzer; Peter Diehl; Björn Buttgereit; Maximilian Rudert
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.154

5.  2008 Otto Aufranc Award: component design and technique affect cement penetration in hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Paul E Beaulé; Wadih Y Matar; Philippe Poitras; Kevin Smit; Olivier May
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: risk factors for failure over 25 years.

Authors:  Eric J Yue; Miguel E Cabanela; Gavan P Duffy; Michael G Heckman; Mary I O'Connor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Metal backing improves the survival of surface replacement of the hip.

Authors:  H Franzén; B Mjöberg; U Rydholm
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Hip resurfacing data from national joint registries: what do they tell us? What do they not tell us?

Authors:  Kristoff Corten; Steven J MacDonald
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  [Surgical principles and clinical experiences with the DUROM hip resurfacing system using a lateral approach].

Authors:  Sascha Gravius; Torsten Mumme; Oliver Weber; Philipp Berdel; Dieter Christian Wirtz
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.154

10.  Serum and urine metal levels in patients with metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anastasia K Skipor; Patricia A Campbell; Leslie M Patterson; Harlan C Anstutz; Thomas P Schmalzried; Joshua J Jacobs
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.