Literature DB >> 15046430

Preservation of the bone mineral density of the femur after surface replacement of the hip.

Y Kishida1, N Sugano, T Nishii, H Miki, K Yamaguchi, H Yoshikawa.   

Abstract

We investigated the effect of the Birmingham hip resurfacing (BHR) arthroplasty on the bone mineral density (BMD) of the femur. A comparative study was carried out on 26 hips in 25 patients. Group A consisted of 13 patients (13 hips) who had undergone resurfacing hip arthroplasty with the BHR system and group B of 12 patients (13 hips) who had had cementless total hip arthroplasty with a proximal circumferential plasma-spray titanium-coated anatomic Ti6A14V stem. Patients were matched for gender, state of disease and age at the time of surgery. The periprosthetic BMD of the femur was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiomentry of the Gruen zones at two years in patients in groups A and B. The median values of the BMD in zones 1 and 7 were 99% and 111%, respectively. The post-operative loss of the BMD in the proximal femur was significantly greater in group B than in group A. These findings show that the BHR system preserves the bone stock of the proximal femur after surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15046430     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b2.14338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  36 in total

1.  [Hip resurfacing arthroplasty].

Authors:  W-C Witzleb; A Knecht; T Beichler; T Köhler; K-P Günther
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Bone mineral density of the proximal femur recovers after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Matteo Cadossi; Antonio Moroni; Matteo Romagnoli; Eugenio Chiarello; Cesare Faldini; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2010-05

3.  Bone mineral density in the femoral neck increases after hip resurfacing: a cohort with five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Charles A Willis-Owen; Henry D Atkinson; Roger D Oakeshott
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-08-22       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Improved mechanical long-term reliability of hip resurfacing prostheses by using silicon nitride.

Authors:  Wen Zhang; M Titze; B Cappi; D C Wirtz; R Telle; H Fischer
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Indications and results of hip resurfacing.

Authors:  D J W McMinn; J Daniel; H Ziaee; C Pradhan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  2011 Marshall Urist Young Investigator Award: when to release patients to high-impact activities after hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Katherine M Bedigrew; Erin L Ruh; Qin Zhang; John C Clohisy; Robert L Barrack; Ryan M Nunley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Hip resurfacing: a technology reborn.

Authors:  Steven Cutts; Paul B Carter
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  The Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: 5-year clinical and radiographic results from a District General Hospital.

Authors:  B Ollivere; S Duckett; A August; M Porteous
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  [Metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing. Development and current state].

Authors:  M Hoberg; M J Le Duff; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Use of patient-specific templates in hip resurfacing arthroplasty: experience from sixteen cases.

Authors:  Hao Du; Xiao-xiao Tian; Tong-sen Li; Jin-sheng Yang; Ke-han Li; Guo-xian Pei; Le Xie
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.