Literature DB >> 4072658

Hip function after total vs. surface replacement.

D R Gore, M P Murray, G M Gardner, S B Sepic.   

Abstract

Kinesiologic measurements were made in two groups of 20 men before and 6 and 24 months after resurfacing or conventional replacement. Before surgery the group to have resurfacing was younger, had less pain, slightly more hip motion, greater muscle strength, walked faster, and used fewer assistive devices during walking than the group to have the conventional replacement. After surgery, the group with resurfacing maintained its advantage in muscle strength and walking velocity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4072658     DOI: 10.3109/17453678508994353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  10 in total

1.  [Intraoperative navigation for hip resurfacing. Methods and first results].

Authors:  T Hess; T Gampe; C Köttgen; B Szawlowski
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Gait analysis after total hip replacement with hip resurfacing implant or Mallory-head Exeter prosthesis: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Mette K Petersen; Niels T Andersen; Poul Mogensen; Michael Voight; Kjeld Søballe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: 5-year clinical and radiographic results from a District General Hospital.

Authors:  B Ollivere; S Duckett; A August; M Porteous
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Gait and stair function in total and resurfacing hip arthroplasty: a pilot study.

Authors:  M Wade Shrader; Manoshi Bhowmik-Stoker; Marc C Jacofsky; David J Jacofsky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  An initial experience with hip resurfacing versus cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Justin Michael Arndt; Glenn D Wera; Victor M Goldberg
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2013-06-25

6.  The John Charnley Award: The functional outcome of hip resurfacing and large-head THA is the same: a randomized, double-blind study.

Authors:  Martin Lavigne; Marc Therrien; Julie Nantel; Alain Roy; François Prince; Pascal-André Vendittoli
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-20       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Center of Mass Compensation during Gait in Hip Arthroplasty Patients: Comparison between Large Diameter Head Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hip Resurfacing.

Authors:  Vicky Bouffard; Julie Nantel; Marc Therrien; Pascal-André Vendittoli; Martin Lavigne; François Prince
Journal:  Rehabil Res Pract       Date:  2011-09-18

Review 8.  The clinical and radiological outcomes of hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Rachel Nichols; Simon T Donell; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Confronting hip resurfacing and big femoral head replacement gait analysis.

Authors:  Panagiotis K Karampinas; Dimitrios S Evangelopoulos; John Vlamis; Konstantinos Nikolopoulos; Dimitrios S Korres
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2014-03-26

10.  Return to sporting activity after Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: Mid term results.

Authors:  Nemandra Sandiford; S K Muirhead-Allwood; J A Skinner
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.251

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.