Literature DB >> 20499061

Hip resurfacing for rheumatoid arthritis: independent assessment of 11-year results from an international register.

Tajeshwar S Aulakh1, Jan H Kuiper, Josh Dixey, James B Richardson.   

Abstract

Total hip replacement has shown good outcomes for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Can hip resurfacing give similar results for patients with rheumatoid arthritis? Using an international hip resurfacing register, 47 patients with rheumatoid arthritis were identified and age and gender matched to a group of 131 randomly selected patients with osteoarthritis of the hip joint. Patients completed a questionnaire to record function and implant revision. Hierarchical regression, Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier method were used for analysis. There was a significant increase in post operative hip score in both groups (p < 0.001) with rheumatoid group scoring higher as compared to the osteoarthritis group (p = 0.23). The post operative score was not significantly influenced by pre-operative score and age (p = 0.15 and 0.84, respectively) but the pre-operative score was a predictor of implant failure (p = 0.02). Patient mobility was affected by age with younger patients scoring high on mobility as compared to older patients (p = 0.01). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a survival rate of 96.3% in the rheumatoid group and 97.8% in the osteoarthritis group. This difference was not significant (Log rank test, p = 0.45). Our results from an independent and international register show that hip resurfacing provides good post-operative hip function and excellent implant survival for patients with rheumatoid arthritis of the hip joint. This procedure can be considered as a viable option for management of rheumatoid arthritis of the hip joint.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20499061      PMCID: PMC3103961          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1046-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  54 in total

1.  The application of multilevel, multivariate modelling to orthodontic research data.

Authors:  M S Gilthorpe; S J Cunningham
Journal:  Community Dent Health       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.349

Review 2.  Applications of hierarchical linear models for evaluations of health interventions: demystifying the methods and interpretations of multilevel models.

Authors:  Ann A O'Connell; D Betsy McCoach
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 3.  Multilevel modelling and public health policy.

Authors:  Alastair H Leyland; Peter P Groenewegen
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.021

4.  Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation.

Authors:  W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Primary total hip arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  W M Tang; K Y Chiu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Uncemented total hip arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis diseases. A two- to six-year follow-up study.

Authors:  A Cracchiolo; R Severt; J Moreland
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Survivorship comparison of THARIES and conventional hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 40 years old.

Authors:  W C Kim; T Grogan; H C Amstutz; F Dorey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The cumulative long-term risk of dislocation after primary Charnley total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daniel J Berry; Marius von Knoch; Cathy D Schleck; W Scott Harmsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Paul E Beaulé; Frederick J Dorey; Michel J Le Duff; Pat A Campbell; Thomas A Gruen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Factors predisposing to periprosthetic fracture after hip arthroplasty: a case (n = 31)-control study.

Authors:  Roope Sarvilinna; Heini S A Huhtala; Roope T Sovelius; Pekka J Halonen; Juha K Nevalainen; K Jorma K Pajamäki
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2004-02
View more
  6 in total

1.  Indications and results of hip resurfacing.

Authors:  D J W McMinn; J Daniel; H Ziaee; C Pradhan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Optimizing Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients for Surgery.

Authors:  Alana Sigmund; Linda A Russell
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 3.  Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: an analysis of safety and revision rates.

Authors:  S Sehatzadeh; K Kaulback; L Levin
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2012-08-01

Review 4.  Metal-on-Metal Bearing: Is This the End of the Line? We Do Not Think So.

Authors:  Henri Migaud; Sophie Putman; Antoine Combes; Charles Berton; Donatien Bocquet; Laurent Vasseur; Julien Girard
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-09-11

5.  Primary total hip arthroplasty using a short bone-conserving stem in young adult osteoporotic patients with Dorr type C femoral bone.

Authors:  Ping Zhen; Yanfeng Chang; Heng Yue; Hui Chen; Shenghu Zhou; Jun Liu; Xiaole He
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty provides excellent long-term survivorship and function in patients with a good-sized femoral head : results of a single, non-designer surgeon's cohort.

Authors:  M Haseeb Gani; Ubaid Zahoor; Sammy A Hanna; Gareth Scott
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2022-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.