Literature DB >> 8769326

Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip. Experience of the McMinn prothesis.

D McMinn1, R Treacy, K Lin, P Pynsent.   

Abstract

The historical failure of surface replacement has been due to the production of wear debris with subsequent bone resorption, loosening, and failure. To avoid these problems, a surface replacement using a metal on metal bearing allowing thin components and femoral design and instrumentation to avoid varus alignment has been designed. Two hundred thirty-five joints have been resurfaced with this prosthesis in almost 5 years. There have been no femoral neck fractures and no dislocations. There have been 4 designs differing in the method of fixation. In the press fit group, 6 of 70 hips had to be revised for aseptic loosening. In the cemented group, debonding of the cup occurred in 3 of 43 cases. Six patients had hydroxyapatite coated components and have had excellent clinical outcomes. The current design uses a peripherally expanded hydroxyapatite coated cup and a cemented metal head; 116 of this design have been implanted during a 19-month period with excellent outcome. Despite short followup the authors are hopeful that the combination of a polar metal on metal bearing with appropriate fixation will yield a method of preserving bone stock in the younger patient requiring arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8769326     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199608001-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  58 in total

1.  High revision rate at 5 years after hip resurfacing with the Durom implant.

Authors:  Florian D Naal; Ronny Pilz; Urs Munzinger; Otmar Hersche; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  [Intraoperative navigation for hip resurfacing. Methods and first results].

Authors:  T Hess; T Gampe; C Köttgen; B Szawlowski
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Surface replacement of the hip: a late revision.

Authors:  Jim S Huntley; James Christie
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  [Early functional results with the Mayo-hip, a short stem system with metaphyseal-intertrochanteric fixation].

Authors:  R Hube; M Zaage; W Hein; H Reichel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  [Hip resurfacing arthroplasty].

Authors:  W-C Witzleb; A Knecht; T Beichler; T Köhler; K-P Günther
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Bone mineral density of the proximal femur recovers after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Matteo Cadossi; Antonio Moroni; Matteo Romagnoli; Eugenio Chiarello; Cesare Faldini; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2010-05

7.  Improved mechanical long-term reliability of hip resurfacing prostheses by using silicon nitride.

Authors:  Wen Zhang; M Titze; B Cappi; D C Wirtz; R Telle; H Fischer
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Indications and results of hip resurfacing.

Authors:  D J W McMinn; J Daniel; H Ziaee; C Pradhan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  2011 Marshall Urist Young Investigator Award: when to release patients to high-impact activities after hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Katherine M Bedigrew; Erin L Ruh; Qin Zhang; John C Clohisy; Robert L Barrack; Ryan M Nunley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  [Surgical principles and clinical experiences with the DUROM hip resurfacing system using a lateral approach].

Authors:  Sascha Gravius; Torsten Mumme; Oliver Weber; Philipp Berdel; Dieter Christian Wirtz
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.