Literature DB >> 19424452

Parafoveal processing in reading: Manipulating n + 1 and n + 2 previews simultaneously.

Bernhard Angele1, Timothy J Slattery, Jinmian Yang, Reinhold Kliegl, Keith Rayner.   

Abstract

The boundary paradigm (Rayner, 1975) with a novel preview manipulation was used to examine the extent of parafoveal processing of words to the right of fixation. Words n + 1 and n + 2 had either correct or incorrect previews prior to fixation (prior to crossing the boundary location). In addition, the manipulation utilized either a high or low frequency word in word n + 1 location on the assumption that it would be more likely that n + 2 preview effects could be obtained when word n + 1 was high frequency. The primary findings were that there was no evidence for a preview benefit for word n + 2 and no evidence for parafoveal-on-foveal effects when word n + 1 is at least four letters long. We discuss implications for models of eye-movement control in reading.

Year:  2008        PMID: 19424452      PMCID: PMC2677831          DOI: 10.1080/13506280802009704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis cogn        ISSN: 1350-6285


  11 in total

1.  Parafoveal-on-foveal interactions in word recognition.

Authors:  Alan Kennedy; Joël Pynte; Stéphanie Ducrot
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2002-10

2.  Tests of the E-Z Reader model: exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control.

Authors:  Alexander Pollatsek; Erik D Reichle; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Antje Nuthmann; Eike M Richter; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Parafoveal preview benefit in reading is only obtained from the saccade goal.

Authors:  Scott A McDonald
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Barbara J Juhasz; Sarah J Brown
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations.

Authors:  Reinhold Kliegl; Antje Nuthmann; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2006-02

7.  Tracking the mind during reading via eye movements: comments on Kliegl, Nuthmann, and Engbert (2006).

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek; Denis Drieghe; Timothy J Slattery; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-08

8.  Preview benefit and parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n + 2.

Authors:  Reinhold Kliegl; Sarah Risse; Jochen Laubrock
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 9.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading.

Authors:  E D Reichle; A Pollatsek; D L Fisher; K Rayner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models.

Authors:  K Rayner; S C Sereno; G E Raney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  13 in total

1.  Eye Movements in Reading: Models and Data.

Authors:  Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 0.957

2.  Eye movements and non-canonical reading: comments on.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek; Simon P Liversedge; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  An Analysis of the Time Course of Lexical Processing During Reading.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-05-04

Review 4.  Parafoveal preview effects from word N + 1 and word N + 2 during reading: A critical review and Bayesian meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Bernhard Angele
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

5.  See before you jump: full recognition of parafoveal words precedes skips during reading.

Authors:  Peter C Gordon; Patrick Plummer; Wonil Choi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Aging, parafoveal preview, and semantic integration in sentence processing: testing the cognitive workload of wrap-up.

Authors:  Brennan R Payne; Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2012-01-09

7.  Time course of target recognition in visual search.

Authors:  Andreas Kotowicz; Ueli Rutishauser; Christof Koch
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Is preview benefit from word n + 2 a common effect in reading Chinese? Evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Jinmian Yang; Keith Rayner; Nan Li; Suiping Wang
Journal:  Read Writ       Date:  2010-11-26

9.  A Theoretical Analysis of the Perceptual Span based on SWIFT Simulations of the n + 2 Boundary Paradigm.

Authors:  Sarah Risse; Sven Hohenstein; Reinhold Kliegl; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2014-02-28

10.  Two stages of parafoveal processing during reading: Evidence from a display change detection task.

Authors:  Bernhard Angele; Timothy J Slattery; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.