Literature DB >> 20664810

Eye Movements in Reading: Models and Data.

Keith Rayner1.   

Abstract

Models of eye movement control in reading and their impact on the field are discussed. Differences between the E-Z Reader model and the SWIFT model are reviewed, as are benchmark data that need to be accounted for by any model of eye movement control. Predictions made by the models and how models can sometimes account for counterintuitive findings are also discussed. Finally, the role of models and data in further understanding the reading process is considered.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20664810      PMCID: PMC2906818     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eye Mov Res        ISSN: 1995-8692            Impact factor:   0.957


  51 in total

1.  Inhibition of saccade return in reading.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Barbara Juhasz; Jane Ashby; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading.

Authors:  Alan Kennedy; Joël Pynte
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Antje Nuthmann; Eike M Richter; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Fixation durations before word skipping in reading.

Authors:  Reinhold Kliegl; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-02

5.  Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect.

Authors:  Antje Nuthmann; Ralf Engbert; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-03-29       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Eye movements and the perceptual span in older and younger readers.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Monica S Castelhano; Jinmian Yang
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2009-09

7.  Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading.

Authors:  K Rayner; D A Balota; A Pollatsek
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1986-12

8.  Inferences about eye movement control from the perceptual span in reading.

Authors:  A Pollatsek; K Rayner; D A Balota
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-08

9.  Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Tessa Warren; Kerry McConnell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

10.  Eye movements when reading disappearing text: the importance of the word to the right of fixation.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Simon P Liversedge; Sarah J White
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  20 in total

1.  Initial eye movements during face identification are optimal and similar across cultures.

Authors:  Charles C-F Or; Matthew F Peterson; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  The time course of contextual influences during lexical ambiguity resolution: evidence from distributional analyses of fixation durations.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Eyal M Reingold
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-10

3.  Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Mallorie Leinenger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  On the processing of canonical word order during eye fixations in reading: Do readers process transposed word previews?

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Bernhard Angele; Elizabeth R Schotter; Klinton Bicknell
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2013-03-01

5.  Eye movements and word skipping during reading: effects of word length and predictability.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Timothy J Slattery; Denis Drieghe; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations.

Authors:  Eyal M Reingold; Erik D Reichle; Mackenzie G Glaholt; Heather Sheridan
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Does Online Comprehension Monitoring Make a Unique Contribution to Reading Comprehension in Beginning Readers? Evidence from Eye Movements.

Authors:  Young-Suk Grace Kim; Christian Vorstius; Ralph Radach
Journal:  Sci Stud Read       Date:  2018-04-05

8.  Cortical control of eye movements in natural reading: Evidence from MVPA.

Authors:  Jessica E Goold; Wonil Choi; John M Henderson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Deep temporal models and active inference.

Authors:  Karl J Friston; Richard Rosch; Thomas Parr; Cathy Price; Howard Bowman
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  Perceptions as hypotheses: saccades as experiments.

Authors:  Karl Friston; Rick A Adams; Laurent Perrinet; Michael Breakspear
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-05-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.