Literature DB >> 12420997

Parafoveal-on-foveal interactions in word recognition.

Alan Kennedy1, Joël Pynte, Stéphanie Ducrot.   

Abstract

An experiment is reported in which participants read sequences of five words, looking for items describing articles of clothing. The third and fourth words in critical sequences were defined as "foveal" and "parafoveal" words, respectively. The length and frequency of foveal words and the length, frequency, and initial-letter constraint of parafoveal words were manipulated. Gaze and refixation rate on the foveal word were measured as a function of properties of the parafoveal word. The results show that measured gaze on a given foveal word is systematically modulated by properties of an unfixated parafoveal word. It is suggested that apparent inconsistencies in previous studies of parafoveal-on-foveal effects relate to a failure to control for foveal word length and hence the visibility of parafoveal words. A serial-sequential attention-switching model of eye movement control cannot account for the pattern of obtained effects. The data are also incompatible with various forms of parallel-processing model. They are best accounted for by postulating a process-monitoring mechanism, sensitive to the simultaneous rate of acquisition of information from foveal and parafoveal sources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12420997     DOI: 10.1080/02724980244000071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  10 in total

Review 1.  Are long compound words identified serially via their constituents? Evidence from an eye-movement-contingent display change study.

Authors:  Jukka Hyönä; Raymond Bertram; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-06

2.  Parafoveal processing in reading: Manipulating n + 1 and n + 2 previews simultaneously.

Authors:  Bernhard Angele; Timothy J Slattery; Jinmian Yang; Reinhold Kliegl; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2008-06-01

3.  Eye movements and the use of parafoveal word length information in reading.

Authors:  Barbara J Juhasz; Sarah J White; Simon P Liversedge; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 4.  Eye movements and brain electric potentials during reading.

Authors:  Reinhold Kliegl; Michael Dambacher; Olaf Dimigen; Arthur M Jacobs; Werner Sommer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-09-14

5.  Readers extract character frequency information from nonfixated-target word at long pretarget fixations during Chinese reading.

Authors:  Guojie Ma; Xingshan Li; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Parafoveal-foveal overlap can facilitate ongoing word identification during reading: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Bernhard Angele; Randy Tran; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The effect of high- and low-frequency previews and sentential fit on word skipping during reading.

Authors:  Bernhard Angele; Abby E Laishley; Keith Rayner; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 8.  ICAT: a computational model for the adaptive control of fixation durations.

Authors:  Hans A Trukenbrod; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-08

9.  Early Attraction in Temporally Controlled Sight Reading of Music.

Authors:  Erkki Huovinen; Anna-Kaisa Ylitalo; Marjaana Puurtinen
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 0.957

10.  Parafoveal-on-foveal repetition effects in sentence reading: A co-registered eye-tracking and electroencephalogram study.

Authors:  Jonathan Mirault; Jeremy Yeaton; Fanny Broqua; Stéphane Dufau; Phillip J Holcomb; Jonathan Grainger
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 4.016

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.