Literature DB >> 19408000

Myocardial perfusion quantitation with 15O-labelled water PET: high reproducibility of the new cardiac analysis software (Carimas).

Sergey V Nesterov1, Chunlei Han, Maija Mäki, Sami Kajander, Alexandru G Naum, Hans Helenius, Irina Lisinen, Heikki Ukkonen, Mikko Pietilä, Esa Joutsiniemi, Juhani Knuuti.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Carimas (Cardiac Image Analysis System) is a new software package developed at the Turku PET Centre for the quantitation of PET studies of the heart with a broad range of tracers. The goal of this study was to assess the reproducibility of results the package provides for myocardial perfusion (MP) quantitation using (15)O-labelled water.
METHODS: Four observers with various levels of experience in nuclear medicine independently analysed 20 MP studies (10 rest flow: "rest", 10 adenosine-induced hyperaemia: "stress"). Each study was analysed twice. The linear mixed model for repeated measures was fitted to the data to calculate intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), differences between the repeats (the intraobserver differences) and differences between the observers (the interobserver differences). Also, Pearson correlation coefficients (r) were calculated and Bland-Altman plots were drawn. The reproducibility of MP was assessed on global, regional and segmental levels. Thereafter, this analysis was applied in 48 consecutive clinical patients with suspected coronary heart disease (CHD).
RESULTS: For the experienced observer the Pearson r for all segments was 0.974 at rest and 0.978 at stress (p < 0.0001), and the repeatability coefficients were 0.145 ml/g per min (15.5% of the average) and 0.389 ml/g per min (14.9%), correspondingly. The ICC reflected very good overall reproducibility. The intraobserver and interobserver differences were small, and the difference between the most and the least experienced observers at stress was 8.5% for the global MP. The clinical accuracy of the perfusion in the detection of CHD was excellent (positive predictive value 91% and negative predictive value 88%) against invasive angiography.
CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate high reproducibility of myocardial perfusion quantitation with (15)O-labelled water PET using Carimas. The results support the feasibility of robust analysis and good clinical accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19408000     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-009-1143-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  14 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Methodology for quantifying absolute myocardial perfusion with PET and SPECT.

Authors:  Martin A Lodge; Frank M Bengel
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Impact of myocardial perfusion imaging with PET and (82)Rb on downstream invasive procedure utilization, costs, and outcomes in coronary disease management.

Authors:  Michael E Merhige; William J Breen; Victoria Shelton; Teresa Houston; Brian J D'Arcy; Anthony F Perna
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Coronary flow reserve in young men with familial combined hyperlipidemia.

Authors:  O P Pitkänen; P Nuutila; O T Raitakari; K Porkka; H Iida; I Nuotio; T Rönnemaa; J Viikari; M R Taskinen; C Ehnholm; J Knuuti
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-04-06       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Assessment of the reproducibility of baseline and hyperemic myocardial blood flow measurements with 15O-labeled water and PET.

Authors:  P A Kaufmann; T Gnecchi-Ruscone; J T Yap; O Rimoldi; P G Camici
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Safety profile of adenosine stress perfusion imaging: results from the Adenoscan Multicenter Trial Registry.

Authors:  M D Cerqueira; M S Verani; M Schwaiger; J Heo; A S Iskandrian
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 8.  Advances in rubidium PET and integrated imaging with CT angiography.

Authors:  Mark F Smith
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Use of the left ventricular time-activity curve as a noninvasive input function in dynamic oxygen-15-water positron emission tomography.

Authors:  H Iida; C G Rhodes; R de Silva; L I Araujo; P M Bloomfield; A A Lammertsma; T Jones
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 10.  Myocardial blood flow measurement by PET: technical aspects and clinical applications.

Authors:  Philipp A Kaufmann; Paolo G Camici
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  52 in total

1.  Non-invasive quantification of tumor blood flow in prostate cancer using 15O-H2O PET/CT.

Authors:  Lars P Tolbod; Maria M Nielsen; Bodil G Pedersen; Søren Høyer; Hendrik J Harms; Michael Borre; Per Borghammer; Kirsten Bouchelouche; Jørgen Frøkiær; Jens Sørensen
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-10-20

Review 2.  PET: Is myocardial flow quantification a clinical reality?

Authors:  Antti Saraste; Sami Kajander; Chunlei Han; Sergey V Nesterov; Juhani Knuuti
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Intra- and inter-operator repeatability of myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve measurements using rubidium-82 pet and a highly automated analysis program.

Authors:  Ran Klein; Jennifer M Renaud; Maria C Ziadi; Stephanie L Thorn; Andy Adler; Rob S Beanlands; Robert A deKemp
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  The clinical utility of assessing myocardial blood flow using positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Maria Cecilia Ziadi; Rob S B Beanlands
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Assessment of endothelial function and myocardial flow reserve using (15)O-water PET without attenuation correction.

Authors:  Stéphane Tuffier; Damien Legallois; Annette Belin; Michael Joubert; Alban Bailliez; Michel Redonnet; Denis Agostini; Alain Manrique
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Clinical use of quantitative cardiac perfusion PET: rationale, modalities and possible indications. Position paper of the Cardiovascular Committee of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM).

Authors:  Roberto Sciagrà; Alessandro Passeri; Jan Bucerius; Hein J Verberne; Riemer H J A Slart; Oliver Lindner; Alessia Gimelli; Fabien Hyafil; Denis Agostini; Christopher Übleis; Marcus Hacker
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Effects of patient movement on measurements of myocardial blood flow and viability in resting ¹⁵O-water PET studies.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Koshino; Hiroshi Watabe; Junichiro Enmi; Yoshiyuki Hirano; Tsutomu Zeniya; Shinji Hasegawa; Takuya Hayashi; Shigeru Miyagawa; Yoshiki Sawa; Jun Hatazawa; Hidehiro Iida
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow will reform the detection of CAD.

Authors:  Juhani Knuuti; Sami Kajander; Maija Mäki; Heikki Ukkonen
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Positron emission tomography detects greater blood flow and less blood flow heterogeneity in the exercising skeletal muscles of old compared with young men during fatiguing contractions.

Authors:  Thorsten Rudroff; Jessica A Weissman; Marco Bucci; Marko Seppänen; Kimmo Kaskinoro; Ilkka Heinonen; Kari K Kalliokoski
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 10.  CFR and FFR assessment with PET and CTA: strengths and limitations.

Authors:  Ryo Nakazato; Ran Heo; Jonathon Leipsic; James K Min
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.