Literature DB >> 8294691

Safety profile of adenosine stress perfusion imaging: results from the Adenoscan Multicenter Trial Registry.

M D Cerqueira1, M S Verani, M Schwaiger, J Heo, A S Iskandrian.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of adenosine infusion at 140 micrograms/kg per min in conjunction with radionuclide imaging in 9,256 consecutive patients.
BACKGROUND: Adenosine produces maximal myocardial hyperemia directly with a rapid onset of action. In addition, when used in conjunction with radionuclide perfusion imaging, it has proven efficacy for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients unable to exercise. Because the ultrashort half-life (< 10s) allows dose titration and rapid reversal of side effects, it may be safer than other available pharmacologic agents.
METHODS: Patients were prospectively entered at 21 clinical sites. Information on safety and adverse events during and immediately after adenosine infusion was maintained in the Adenoscan Multicenter Trial Registry.
RESULTS: The infusion protocol was completed in 80% of patients, required dose reduction in 13% and was terminated early in 7%. Interpretable imaging studies were obtained in 98.7% of patients, and 0.8% of patients received aminophylline. Minor and well tolerated side effects were reported in 81.1% of patients. There were no deaths, one myocardial infarction, seven episodes of severe bronchospasm and one episode of pulmonary edema. Transient atrioventricular (AV) node block occurred in 706 patients (first-degree in 256, second-degree in 378 and third-degree in 72) and resolved spontaneously in most patients (n = 508) without alteration in the adenosine infusion. There were no sustained episodes of AV block. Patients > 70 years of age had an increased risk of developing AV block (age < 70, 7.05% vs. > or = 70, 9.44%, p = 0.001, relative risk 1.37).
CONCLUSIONS: Adenosine infusion is safe. Vasodilator and negative dromotropic side effects are generally well tolerated. Serious side effects are relatively rare, and they reverse with termination of adenosine infusion. Interpretable radionuclide studies were obtained in 98.7% of patients and aminophylline reversal was seldom required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8294691     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90424-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  134 in total

1.  Pharmacologic stress testing: understanding the options.

Authors:  M P White
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Pharmacologic stress testing: new methods and new agents.

Authors:  Robert C Hendel; Tariq Jamil; David K Glover
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of intravenous infusion of adenosine (SUNY4001) in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  T Uematsu; O Kozawa; H Matsuno; M Niwa; H Yoshikoshi; M Oh-uchi; K Kohno; S Nagashima; M Kanamaru
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Procedure guidelines for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  C Anagnostopoulos; M Harbinson; A Kelion; K Kundley; C Y Loong; A Notghi; E Reyes; W Tindale; S R Underwood
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Acute myocardial infarction during adenosine myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Eliana Reyes; Kshama Wechalekar; Chee Y Loong; S Richard Underwood
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  The impact of caffeine on vasodilator stress perfusion studies.

Authors:  Andre C Lapeyre; Tauqir Y Goraya; Donald L Johnston; Raymond J Gibbons
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Regadenoson stress in patients with asthma and COPD: a breath of fresh air.

Authors:  Randall C Thompson
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Patient-centered imaging.

Authors:  E Gordon Depuey; John J Mahmarian; Todd D Miller; Andrew J Einstein; Christopher L Hansen; Thomas A Holly; Edward J Miller; Donna M Polk; L Samuel Wann
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Comparison of diagnostic performances of three different software packages in detecting coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Levent A Guner; Nese Ilgin Karabacak; Tansel Cakir; Ozgur U Akdemir; Sinan A Kocaman; Atiye Cengel; Mustafa Unlu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Patient satisfaction with coronary CT angiography, myocardial CT perfusion, myocardial perfusion MRI, SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging and conventional coronary angiography.

Authors:  S Feger; M Rief; E Zimmermann; F Richter; R Roehle; M Dewey; E Schönenberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.