Literature DB >> 26280980

Assessment of endothelial function and myocardial flow reserve using (15)O-water PET without attenuation correction.

Stéphane Tuffier1, Damien Legallois1,2, Annette Belin3, Michael Joubert1, Alban Bailliez1, Michel Redonnet4, Denis Agostini1,5, Alain Manrique6,7,8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Myocardial blood flow (MBF) measurement using positron emission tomography (PET) from the washout rate of (15)O-water is theoretically independent of tissue attenuation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of not using attenuation correction in the assessment of coronary endothelial function and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) using (15)O-water PET.
METHODS: We retrospectively processed 70 consecutive (15)O-water PET examinations obtained at rest and during cold pressor testing (CPT) in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 58), or at rest and during adenosine infusion in heart transplant recipients (n = 12). Data were reconstructed with attenuation correction (AC) and without attenuation correction (NAC) using filtered backprojection, and MBF was quantified using a single compartmental model. The agreement between AC and NAC data was assessed using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient followed by Bland-Altman plot analysis.
RESULTS: Regarding endothelial function, NAC PET showed poor reproducibility and poor agreement with AC PET data. Conversely, NAC PET demonstrated high reproducibility and a strong agreement with AC PET for the assessment of MFR.
CONCLUSION: Non-attenuation-corrected (15)O-water PET provided an accurate measurement of MFR compared to attenuation-corrected PET. However, non-attenuation-corrected PET data were less effective for the assessment of endothelial function using CPT in this population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  15O-water; Attenuation correction; Endothelial function; Myocardial flow reserve; Myocardial perfusion; Positron emission tomography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26280980     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-015-3163-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  22 in total

1.  Radiation risk from coronary artery disease imaging: how do different diagnostic tests compare?

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Quantitative myocardial blood flow imaging: not all flow is equal.

Authors:  Paul Knaapen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Methods for evaluating the agreement between diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Charity J Morgan; Inmaculada Aban
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.

Authors:  L I Lin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Low-dose quantitative myocardial blood flow imaging using 15O-water and PET without attenuation correction.

Authors:  Mark Lubberink; Hendrik J Harms; Rick Halbmeijer; Stefan de Haan; Paul Knaapen; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Heterogeneity of resting and hyperemic myocardial blood flow in healthy humans.

Authors:  P Chareonthaitawee; P A Kaufmann; O Rimoldi; P G Camici
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 10.787

8.  Quantification of regional myocardial blood flow in vivo with H215O.

Authors:  S R Bergmann; K A Fox; A L Rand; K D McElvany; M J Welch; J Markham; B E Sobel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Use of the left ventricular time-activity curve as a noninvasive input function in dynamic oxygen-15-water positron emission tomography.

Authors:  H Iida; C G Rhodes; R de Silva; L I Araujo; P M Bloomfield; A A Lammertsma; T Jones
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Perfusable tissue index as a potential marker of fibrosis in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Paul Knaapen; Ronald Boellaard; Marco J W Götte; Pieter A Dijkmans; Linda M C van Campen; Carel C de Cock; Gert Luurtsema; Cees A Visser; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Frans C Visser
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  3 in total

1.  Influence of image reconstruction on quantitative cardiac 15O-water positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Jonny Nordström; Elin Lindström; Tanja Kero; Jens Sörensen; Mark Lubberink
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.872

2.  Cardiac 15O-water PET: Does mismatched attenuation correction not matter?

Authors:  Benjamin C Lee
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.872

3.  First validation of myocardial flow reserve assessed by dynamic 99mTc-sestamibi CZT-SPECT camera: head to head comparison with 15O-water PET and fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. The WATERDAY study.

Authors:  Denis Agostini; Vincent Roule; Catherine Nganoa; Nathaniel Roth; Raphael Baavour; Jean-Jacques Parienti; Farzin Beygui; Alain Manrique
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 9.236

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.