Literature DB >> 26846913

Clinical use of quantitative cardiac perfusion PET: rationale, modalities and possible indications. Position paper of the Cardiovascular Committee of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM).

Roberto Sciagrà1, Alessandro Passeri2, Jan Bucerius3,4,5, Hein J Verberne6, Riemer H J A Slart7,8, Oliver Lindner9, Alessia Gimelli10, Fabien Hyafil11,12, Denis Agostini13, Christopher Übleis14, Marcus Hacker15.   

Abstract

Until recently, PET was regarded as a luxurious way of performing myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, with excellent image quality and diagnostic capabilities that hardly justified the additional cost and procedural effort. Quantitative perfusion PET was considered a major improvement over standard qualitative imaging, because it allows the measurement of parameters not otherwise available, but for many years its use was confined to academic and research settings. In recent years, however, several factors have contributed to the renewal of interest in quantitative perfusion PET, which has become a much more readily accessible technique due to progress in hardware and the availability of dedicated and user-friendly platforms and programs. In spite of this evolution and of the growing evidence that quantitative perfusion PET can play a role in the clinical setting, there are not yet clear indications for its clinical use. Therefore, the Cardiovascular Committee of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine, starting from the experience of its members, decided to examine the current literature on quantitative perfusion PET to (1) evaluate the rationale for its clinical use, (2) identify the main methodological requirements, (3) identify the remaining technical difficulties, (4) define the most reliable interpretation criteria, and finally (5) tentatively delineate currently acceptable and possibly appropriate clinical indications. The present position paper must be considered as a starting point aiming to promote a wider use of quantitative perfusion PET and to encourage the conception and execution of the studies needed to definitely establish its role in clinical practice.

Keywords:  Coronary flow reserve; Myocardial blood flow; Positron emission tomography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26846913     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-016-3317-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  150 in total

Review 1.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve: Technical aspects.

Authors:  Ran Klein; Rob S B Beanlands; Robert A deKemp
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Coronary vascular dysfunction and prognosis in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Venkatesh L Murthy; Masanao Naya; Courtney R Foster; Jon Hainer; Mariya Gaber; Sharmila Dorbala; David M Charytan; Ron Blankstein; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-10

3.  Physiological basis for angina and ST-segment change PET-verified thresholds of quantitative stress myocardial perfusion and coronary flow reserve.

Authors:  Nils P Johnson; K Lance Gould
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-09

4.  Surgical correction of left coronary artery origin from the right coronary artery.

Authors:  Michele Coceani; Marco Ciardetti; Emilio Pasanisi; Mathis Schlueter; Cataldo Palmieri; Danilo Neglia; Roberto Sciagrà; Mattia Glauber; Daniele Rovai
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-12-25       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Impact of anatomical and functional severity of coronary atherosclerotic plaques on the transmural perfusion gradient: a [15O]H2O PET study.

Authors:  Ibrahim Danad; Pieter G Raijmakers; Hendrik J Harms; Martijn W Heymans; Niels van Royen; Mark Lubberink; Ronald Boellaard; Albert C van Rossum; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Paul Knaapen
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Consequences of using a simplified kinetic model for dynamic PET data.

Authors:  P G Coxson; R H Huesman; L Borland
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Incremental prognostic value of gated Rb-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging over clinical variables and rest LVEF.

Authors:  Sharmila Dorbala; Rory Hachamovitch; Zelmira Curillova; Deepak Thomas; Divya Vangala; Raymond Y Kwong; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-07

8.  Absolute quantitation of myocardial blood flow in human subjects with or without myocardial ischemia using dynamic flurpiridaz F 18 PET.

Authors:  René R S Packard; Sung-Cheng Huang; Magnus Dahlbom; Johannes Czernin; Jamshid Maddahi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Underestimation of coronary artery disease with SPECT perfusion imaging.

Authors:  George A Beller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.872

10.  Quantification of absolute myocardial perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease: comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Geraint Morton; Amedeo Chiribiri; Masaki Ishida; Shazia T Hussain; Andreas Schuster; Andreas Indermuehle; Divaka Perera; Juhani Knuuti; Stacey Baker; Erik Hedström; Paul Schleyer; Michael O'Doherty; Sally Barrington; Eike Nagel
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Updates on Stress Imaging Testing and Myocardial Viability With Advanced Imaging Modalities.

Authors:  Sandeep S Hedgire; Michael Osborne; Daniel J Verdini; Brian B Ghoshhajra
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-04

Review 2.  Cardiac imaging: working towards fully-automated machine analysis & interpretation.

Authors:  Piotr J Slomka; Damini Dey; Arkadiusz Sitek; Manish Motwani; Daniel S Berman; Guido Germano
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.166

3.  15-O-water myocardial flow reserve PET and CT angiography by full hybrid PET/CT as a potential alternative to invasive angiography.

Authors:  Anders Thomassen; Poul-Erik Braad; Kasper T Pedersen; Henrik Petersen; Allan Johansen; Axel C P Diederichsen; Hans Mickley; Lisette O Jensen; Juhani Knuuti; Oke Gerke; Poul F Høilund-Carlsen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Role of quantitative myocardial positron emission tomography for risk stratification in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a 2016 reappraisal.

Authors:  Helga Castagnoli; Cecilia Ferrantini; Raffaele Coppini; Alessandro Passeri; Katia Baldini; Valentina Berti; Franco Cecchi; Iacopo Olivotto; Roberto Sciagrà
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  A joint procedural position statement on imaging in cardiac sarcoidosis: from the Cardiovascular and Inflammation & Infection Committees of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine, the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

Authors:  Riemer H J A Slart; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Patrizio Lancellotti; Fabien Hyafil; Ron Blankstein; Ronald G Schwartz; Wael A Jaber; Raymond Russell; Alessia Gimelli; François Rouzet; Marcus Hacker; Olivier Gheysens; Sven Plein; Edward J Miller; Sharmila Dorbala; Erwan Donal
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Clinical use of cardiac PET/MRI: current state-of-the-art and potential future applications.

Authors:  Patrick Krumm; Stefanie Mangold; Sergios Gatidis; Konstantin Nikolaou; Felix Nensa; Fabian Bamberg; Christian la Fougère
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  No need for frame-wise attenuation correction in dynamic Rubidium-82 PET for myocardial blood flow quantification.

Authors:  J D van Dijk; P L Jager; J P Ottervanger; C H Slump; J A van Dalen
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Myocardial blood flow and left ventricular functional reserve in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a 13NH3 gated PET study.

Authors:  Roberto Sciagrà; Raffaella Calabretta; Fabrizio Cipollini; Alessandro Passeri; Angelo Castello; Franco Cecchi; Iacopo Olivotto; Alberto Pupi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Validation of myocardial perfusion quantification by dynamic CT in an ex-vivo porcine heart model.

Authors:  Gert Jan Pelgrim; Marco Das; Sjoerd van Tuijl; Marly van Assen; Frits W Prinzen; Marco Stijnen; Matthijs Oudkerk; Joachim E Wildberger; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 10.  Hybrid cardiac imaging using PET/MRI: a joint position statement by the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology (ESCR) and the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM).

Authors:  Felix Nensa; Fabian Bamberg; Christoph Rischpler; Leon Menezes; Thorsten D Poeppel; Christian la Fougère; Dietrich Beitzke; Sazan Rasul; Christian Loewe; Konstantin Nikolaou; Jan Bucerius; Andreas Kjaer; Matthias Gutberlet; Niek H Prakken; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Riemer H J A Slart; Stephan G Nekolla; Martin L Lassen; Bernd J Pichler; Thomas Schlosser; Alexis Jacquier; Harald H Quick; Michael Schäfers; Marcus Hacker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.