Literature DB >> 10565780

Assessment of the reproducibility of baseline and hyperemic myocardial blood flow measurements with 15O-labeled water and PET.

P A Kaufmann1, T Gnecchi-Ruscone, J T Yap, O Rimoldi, P G Camici.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: PET with 15O-labeled water allows noninvasive quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) at baseline and during pharmacologically induced hyperemia to assess the coronary vasodilator reserve (CVR = hyperemic/baseline MBF). Despite widespread use of PET, its reproducibility during one study session has not been tested. Intravenous adenosine (Ado), a powerful coronary vasodilator with a very short decay time, is commonly used for the induction of hyperemia. However, it is not known whether Ado can induce tachyphylaxis after short-term repetitive administration. In this study, we aimed to test the reproducibility of PET assessment of CVR during Ado-induced hyperemia.
METHODS: In 21 healthy volunteer men, baseline and Ado MBF were measured twice using PET with 15O-labeled water to obtain two CVR assessments within 1 h.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two baselines (0.89 +/- 0.14 versus 0.99 +/- 0.15 mL/min/g, mean difference 13% +/- 11%) or between the two hyperemic MBFs (3.51 +/- 0.45 versus 3.83 +/- 0.49 mL/min/g, mean difference 10% +/- 14%), resulting in comparable values of CVR (4.05 +/- 0.75 versus 3.93 +/- 0.72, mean difference 2% +/- 15%). The repeatability coefficient for MBF was 0.17 mL/min/g at baseline and 0.94 mL/min/g during hyperemia. The repeatability coefficient of the rate pressure product (RPP) was lower at baseline (1,304 mm Hg x beat/min) than during hyperemia (3,448 mm Hg x beat/min).
CONCLUSION: Repeated measurements of MBF and CVR during the same study session were not significantly different, demonstrating the validity of the technique. The larger variability of hyperemic flow, as indicated by the larger repeatability coefficient, was paralleled by a greater variability of the RPP. This could mean that the greater variability of MBF during stress is more likely due to a variable response to Ado rather than to a measurement error.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10565780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  68 in total

1.  Effect of liraglutide on myocardial glucose uptake and blood flow in stable chronic heart failure patients: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled LIVE sub-study.

Authors:  Roni Nielsen; Anders Jorsal; Peter Iversen; Lars Poulsen Tolbod; Kirsten Bouchelouche; Jens Sørensen; Hendrik Johannes Harms; Allan Flyvbjerg; Lise Tarnow; Caroline Kistorp; Ida Gustafsson; Hans Erik Bøtker; Henrik Wiggers
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Intra- and inter-operator repeatability of myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve measurements using rubidium-82 pet and a highly automated analysis program.

Authors:  Ran Klein; Jennifer M Renaud; Maria C Ziadi; Stephanie L Thorn; Andy Adler; Rob S Beanlands; Robert A deKemp
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Clinical use of quantitative cardiac perfusion PET: rationale, modalities and possible indications. Position paper of the Cardiovascular Committee of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM).

Authors:  Roberto Sciagrà; Alessandro Passeri; Jan Bucerius; Hein J Verberne; Riemer H J A Slart; Oliver Lindner; Alessia Gimelli; Fabien Hyafil; Denis Agostini; Christopher Übleis; Marcus Hacker
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Regional heterogeneity of resting perfusion in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is related to delayed contrast enhancement but not to systolic function: a PET and MRI study.

Authors:  Paul Knaapen; Willem G van Dockum; Marco J W Götte; Kimiko A Broeze; Joost P A Kuijer; Jaco J M Zwanenburg; J Tim Marcus; Wouter E M Kok; Albert C van Rossum; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Frans C Visser
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Role of PET in the evaluation and understanding of coronary physiology.

Authors:  Thomas H Schindler; Xiao-Li Zhang; Gabriella Vincenti; Leila Mhiri; René Lerch; Heinrich R Schelbert
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion by dynamic O-15-labeled water PET imaging: validation of a new fast factor analysis.

Authors:  Itaru Adachi; Oliver Gaemperli; Ines Valenta; Tiziano Schepis; Patrick T Siegrist; Valerie Treyer; Cyrill Burger; Koichi Morita; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  PET and MRI in cardiac imaging: from validation studies to integrated applications.

Authors:  Stephan G Nekolla; Axel Martinez-Moeller; Antti Saraste
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Protocol for measuring myocardial blood flow by PET/CT in cats.

Authors:  Simone D Jenni; Tiziano Schepis; Rolf Jenni; Patrick T Siegrist; Philipp A Kaufmann; Tony M Glaus
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Coronary calcium score scans for attenuation correction of quantitative PET/CT 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Nina Burkhard; Bernhard A Herzog; Lars Husmann; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Irene A Burger; Ronny R Buechel; Ines Valenta; Christophe A Wyss; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Feasibility of myocardial flow reserve prediction without the use of dynamic data from myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Hidenobu Hashimoto; Yoshimitsu Fukushima; Shin-Ichiro Kumita; Takeshi Tomiyama; Tomonari Kiriyama
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.