Literature DB >> 19227512

Motor learning and consolidation: the case of visuomotor rotation.

John W Krakauer1.   

Abstract

Adaptation to visuomotor rotation is a particular form of motor learning distinct from force-field adaptation, sequence learning, and skill learning. Nevertheless, study of adaptation to visuomotor rotation has yielded a number of findings and principles that are likely of general importance to procedural learning and memory. First, rotation learning is implicit and appears to proceed through reduction in a visual prediction error generated by a forward model, such implicit adaptation occurs even when it is in conflict with an explicit task goal. Second, rotation learning is subject to different forms of interference: retrograde, anterograde through aftereffects, and contextual blocking of retrieval. Third, opposite rotations can be recalled within a short time interval without interference if implicit contextual cues (effector change) rather than explicit cues (color change) are used. Fourth, rotation learning consolidates both over time and with increased initial training (saturation learning).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19227512      PMCID: PMC2672910          DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-77064-2_21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  31 in total

1.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Becoming aware of motor skill.

Authors:  D B. Willingham
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Long-lasting aftereffects of prism adaptation in the monkey.

Authors:  P B Yin; S Kitazawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  The psychology and neuroscience of forgetting.

Authors:  John T Wixted
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

5.  The predictive value of the leveling off of within session performance for procedural memory consolidation.

Authors:  Björn Hauptmann; Eva Reinhart; Stephan A Brandt; Avi Karni
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-07

6.  An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The interference effects of non-rotated versus counter-rotated trials in visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Mark R Hinder; Laura Walk; Daniel G Woolley; Stephan Riek; Richard G Carson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Mechanisms underlying interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Parallel brain systems for learning with and without awareness.

Authors:  P J Reber; L R Squire
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  Adaptation to visuomotor transformations: consolidation, interference, and forgetting.

Authors:  John W Krakauer; Claude Ghez; M Felice Ghilardi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  99 in total

1.  Changes in muscle directional tuning parallel feedforward adaptation to a visuomotor rotation.

Authors:  Aymar de Rugy; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Neuroplasticity subserving motor skill learning.

Authors:  Eran Dayan; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Critical neural substrates for correcting unexpected trajectory errors and learning from them.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Robert L Sainburg; Kathleen Y Haaland
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Beside the point: motor adaptation without feedback-based error correction in task-irrelevant conditions.

Authors:  Sydney Y Schaefer; Iris L Shelly; Kurt A Thoroughman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  How does the motor system correct for errors in time and space during locomotor adaptation?

Authors:  Laura A Malone; Amy J Bastian; Gelsy Torres-Oviedo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Optimal feedback control and the long-latency stretch response.

Authors:  J Andrew Pruszynski; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Dissociating the roles of the cerebellum and motor cortex during adaptive learning: the motor cortex retains what the cerebellum learns.

Authors:  Joseph M Galea; Alejandro Vazquez; Neel Pasricha; Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Optimization of a motor learning attention-directing strategy based on an individual's motor imagery ability.

Authors:  Takeshi Sakurada; Masahiro Hirai; Eiju Watanabe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The cerebellum does more than sensory prediction error-based learning in sensorimotor adaptation tasks.

Authors:  Peter A Butcher; Richard B Ivry; Sheng-Han Kuo; David Rydz; John W Krakauer; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Explicit and implicit contributions to learning in a sensorimotor adaptation task.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; John W Krakauer; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.