Literature DB >> 22370742

Optimal feedback control and the long-latency stretch response.

J Andrew Pruszynski1, Stephen H Scott.   

Abstract

There has traditionally been a separation between voluntary control processes and the fast feedback responses which follow mechanical perturbations (i.e., stretch "reflexes"). However, a recent theory of motor control, based on optimal control, suggests that voluntary motor behavior involves the sophisticated manipulation of sensory feedback. We have recently proposed that one implication of this theory is that the long-latency stretch "reflex", like voluntary control, should support a rich assortment of behaviors because these two processes are intimately linked through shared neural circuitry including primary motor cortex. In this review, we first describe the basic principles of optimal feedback control related to voluntary motor behavior. We then explore the functional properties of upper-limb stretch responses, with a focus on how the sophistication of the long-latency stretch response rivals voluntary control. And last, we describe the neural circuitry that underlies the long-latency stretch response and detail the evidence that primary motor cortex participates in sophisticated feedback responses to mechanical perturbations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22370742     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3041-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  173 in total

1.  Interaction of the Jendrássik maneuver with segmental presynaptic inhibition.

Authors:  E P Zehr; R B Stein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Long-latency and voluntary responses to an arm displacement can be rapidly attenuated by perturbation offset.

Authors:  Isaac Kurtzer; J Andrew Pruszynski; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Task-dependent changes in the response of human wrist joints to mechanical disturbance.

Authors:  F Doemges; P M Rack
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Endpoint stiffness of the arm is directionally tuned to instability in the environment.

Authors:  David W Franklin; Gary Liaw; Theodore E Milner; Rieko Osu; Etienne Burdet; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The long-latency reflex is composed of at least two functionally independent processes.

Authors:  J Andrew Pruszynski; Isaac Kurtzer; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements.

Authors:  N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Human postural responses.

Authors:  C D Marsden; P A Merton; H B Morton
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  The differential role of motor cortex in stretch reflex modulation induced by changes in environmental mechanics and verbal instruction.

Authors:  Jonathan Shemmell; Je Hi An; Eric J Perreault
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Human motor cortex: sensory input data from single neuron recordings.

Authors:  S Goldring; R Ratcheson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-03-31       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Tizanidine does not affect the linear relation of stretch duration to the long latency M2 response of m. flexor carpi radialis.

Authors:  Carel G M Meskers; Alfred C Schouten; Marieke M L Rich; Jurriaan H de Groot; Jasper Schuurmans; J H Arendzen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  90 in total

1.  Proprioceptive reaction times and long-latency reflexes in humans.

Authors:  C D Manning; S A Tolhurst; P Bawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Goal-dependent modulation of the long-latency stretch response at the shoulder, elbow, and wrist.

Authors:  Jeffrey Weiler; Paul L Gribble; J Andrew Pruszynski
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Long-latency reflexes of elbow and shoulder muscles suggest reciprocal excitation of flexors, reciprocal excitation of extensors, and reciprocal inhibition between flexors and extensors.

Authors:  Isaac Kurtzer; Jenna Meriggi; Nidhi Parikh; Kenneth Saad
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The temporal evolution of feedback gains rapidly update to task demands.

Authors:  Michael Dimitriou; Daniel M Wolpert; David W Franklin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Long-latency muscle activity reflects continuous, delayed sensorimotor feedback of task-level and not joint-level error.

Authors:  Seyed A Safavynia; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Speed, resistance, and unexpected accelerations modulate feed forward and feedback control during a novel weight bearing task.

Authors:  Shih-Chiao Tseng; Keith R Cole; Michael A Shaffer; Michael A Petrie; Chu-Ling Yen; Richard K Shields
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  Sensory information from a slipping object elicits a rapid and automatic shoulder response.

Authors:  Carlos R Hernandez-Castillo; Rodrigo S Maeda; J Andrew Pruszynski; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Time course of changes in the long-latency feedback response parallels the fast process of short-term motor adaptation.

Authors:  Susan K Coltman; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  StretchfMRI: a novel technique to quantify the contribution of the reticular formation to long-latency responses via fMRI.

Authors:  Andrea Zonnino; Andria J Farrens; David Ress; Fabrizio Sergi
Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot       Date:  2019-06

10.  Feedforward and Feedback Control Share an Internal Model of the Arm's Dynamics.

Authors:  Rodrigo S Maeda; Tyler Cluff; Paul L Gribble; J Andrew Pruszynski
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.