Literature DB >> 11713636

Long-lasting aftereffects of prism adaptation in the monkey.

P B Yin1, S Kitazawa.   

Abstract

The errors in target-reaching that are produced by laterally displacing vision with wedge prisms decrease with trials (prism adaptation). When the prisms are removed, errors in the opposite direction are observed (aftereffect). We investigated the size of the aftereffect 24 h and 72 h after a monkey had adapted to a visual displacement (30 mm), with rapid reaching movements. The aftereffect more than half of the size of the displacement was observed when the effect was tested immediately after the monkey had been exposed to the displacement for 50 trials. In contrast, the aftereffect was not observed at 24 h even when the monkey had been exposed to the displacement for 250 trials. However, when the monkey had been exposed for 500 trials, significant aftereffects more than half of the size of the displacement were observed at 24 h and 72 h. When both arms were adapted to opposite prism displacements, the long-lasting aftereffect was further shown to be specific for the arm used during the exposure. The results indicate that the aftereffects of prism adaptation last for at least 3 days, though more than 200 trials of additional repetition are required to consolidate the short-term effects into long-lasting ones.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11713636     DOI: 10.1007/s002210100892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  19 in total

1.  Physical delay but not subjective delay determines learning rate in prism adaptation.

Authors:  Hirokazu Tanaka; Kazuhiro Homma; Hiroshi Imamizu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Two waves of a long-lasting aftereffect of prism adaptation measured over 7 days.

Authors:  Y Hatada; R C Miall; Y Rossetti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Learning of a sequential motor skill comprises explicit and implicit components that consolidate differently.

Authors:  M Felice Ghilardi; Clara Moisello; Giulia Silvestri; Claude Ghez; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The training schedule affects the stability, not the magnitude, of the interlimb transfer of learned dynamics.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; Jordan B Brayanov; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Long-term retention explained by a model of short-term learning in the adaptive control of reaching.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Basal ganglia-dependent processes in recalling learned visual-motor adaptations.

Authors:  Patrick Bédard; Jerome N Sanes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Disruption of M1 Activity during Performance Plateau Impairs Consolidation of Motor Memories.

Authors:  Raphaël Hamel; Maxime Trempe; Pierre-Michel Bernier
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Neurobiology of rehabilitation.

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Dissociating effects of error size, training duration, and amount of adaptation on the ability to retain motor memories.

Authors:  Laith Alhussein; Eghbal A Hosseini; Katrina P Nguyen; Maurice A Smith; Wilsaan M Joiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Learning the spatial features of a locomotor task is slowed after stroke.

Authors:  Christine M Tyrell; Erin Helm; Darcy S Reisman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.