Literature DB >> 21139077

Dissociating the roles of the cerebellum and motor cortex during adaptive learning: the motor cortex retains what the cerebellum learns.

Joseph M Galea1, Alejandro Vazquez, Neel Pasricha, Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry, Pablo Celnik.   

Abstract

Adaptation to a novel visuomotor transformation has revealed important principles regarding learning and memory. Computational and behavioral studies have suggested that acquisition and retention of a new visuomotor transformation are distinct processes. However, this dissociation has never been clearly shown. Here, participants made fast reaching movements while unexpectedly a 30-degree visuomotor transformation was introduced. During visuomotor adaptation, subjects received cerebellar, primary motor cortex (M1) or sham anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a noninvasive form of brain stimulation known to increase excitability. We found that cerebellar tDCS caused faster adaptation to the visuomotor transformation, as shown by a rapid reduction of movement errors. These findings were not present with similar modulation of visual cortex excitability. In contrast, tDCS over M1 did not affect adaptation, but resulted in a marked increase in retention of the newly learnt visuomotor transformation. These results show a clear dissociation in the processes of acquisition and retention during adaptive motor learning and demonstrate that the cerebellum and primary motor cortex have distinct functional roles. Furthermore, they show that is possible to enhance cerebellar function using tDCS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21139077      PMCID: PMC3138512          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhq246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  48 in total

1.  Patterns of regional brain activation associated with different forms of motor learning.

Authors:  M Ghilardi; C Ghez; V Dhawan; J Moeller; M Mentis; T Nakamura; A Antonini; D Eidelberg
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2000-07-14       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation impairs the practice-dependent proficiency increase in working memory.

Authors:  R Ferrucci; S Marceglia; M Vergari; F Cogiamanian; S Mrakic-Sposta; F Mameli; S Zago; S Barbieri; A Priori
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Persistence of motor memories reflects statistics of the learning event.

Authors:  Vincent S Huang; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation.

Authors:  Janine Reis; Heidi M Schambra; Leonardo G Cohen; Ethan R Buch; Brita Fritsch; Eric Zarahn; Pablo A Celnik; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Adaptation to visuomotor transformations: consolidation, interference, and forgetting.

Authors:  John W Krakauer; Claude Ghez; M Felice Ghilardi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Throwing while looking through prisms. I. Focal olivocerebellar lesions impair adaptation.

Authors:  T A Martin; J G Keating; H P Goodkin; A J Bastian; W T Thach
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Modulation of cerebellar excitability by polarity-specific noninvasive direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Joseph M Galea; Gowri Jayaram; Loni Ajagbe; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Modulation of internal model formation during force field-induced motor learning by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Timothy Hunter; Paul Sacco; Michael A Nitsche; Duncan L Turner
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Magnetic stimuli applied over motor and visual cortex: influence of coil position and field polarity on motor responses, phosphenes, and eye movements.

Authors:  B U Meyer; R Diehl; H Steinmetz; T C Britton; R Benecke
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl       Date:  1991
View more
  268 in total

Review 1.  Are we ready for a natural history of motor learning?

Authors:  Lior Shmuelof; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Critical neural substrates for correcting unexpected trajectory errors and learning from them.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Robert L Sainburg; Kathleen Y Haaland
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 3.  Principles of sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert; Jörn Diedrichsen; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 4.  From movement to thought: executive function, embodied cognition, and the cerebellum.

Authors:  Leonard F Koziol; Deborah Ely Budding; Dana Chidekel
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Noninvasive neurostimulation of left ventral motor cortex enhances sensorimotor adaptation in speech production.

Authors:  Terri L Scott; Laura Haenchen; Ayoub Daliri; Julia Chartove; Frank H Guenther; Tyler K Perrachione
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Did I do that? Detecting a perturbation to visual feedback in a reaching task.

Authors:  Elon Gaffin-Cahn; Todd E Hudson; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Predicting and correcting ataxia using a model of cerebellar function.

Authors:  Nasir H Bhanpuri; Allison M Okamura; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Contributions of the cerebellum and the motor cortex to acquisition and retention of motor memories.

Authors:  David J Herzfeld; Damien Pastor; Adrian M Haith; Yves Rossetti; Reza Shadmehr; Jacinta O'Shea
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Explicit and implicit contributions to learning in a sensorimotor adaptation task.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; John W Krakauer; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Sensorimotor Rhythm BCI with Simultaneous High Definition-Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Alters Task Performance.

Authors:  Bryan S Baxter; Bradley J Edelman; Nicholas Nesbitt; Bin He
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 8.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.