Literature DB >> 15647491

Adaptation to visuomotor transformations: consolidation, interference, and forgetting.

John W Krakauer1, Claude Ghez, M Felice Ghilardi.   

Abstract

The paradigm task A-->task B-->task A, which varies the time interval between task A and task B, has been used extensively to investigate the consolidation of motor memory. Consolidation is defined as resistance to retrograde interference (interference by task B on initial learning of task A). Consolidation has been demonstrated for simple skills, motor sequencing, and learning of force fields. In contrast, evidence to date suggests that visuomotor learning does not consolidate. We have shown previously that adaptation to a 30 degrees screen-cursor rotation is faster and more complete on relearning 24 hr later. This improvement is prevented if a 30 degrees counter-rotation is learned 5 min after the original rotation. Here, we sought to identify conditions under which rotation learning becomes resistant to interference by a counter-rotation. In experiment 1, we found that interference persists even when the counter-rotation is learned 24 hr after the initial rotation. In experiment 2, we removed potential anterograde interference (interference by task B on relearning of task A) by introducing washout blocks before all of the learning blocks. In contrast to experiment 1, we found resistance to interference (i.e., consolidation) when the counter-rotation was learned after 24 hr but not after 5 min. In experiment 3, we doubled the amount of initial rotation learning and found resistance to interference even after 5 min. Our results suggest that persistent interference is attributable to anterograde effects on memory retrieval. When anterograde effects are removed, rotation learning consolidates both over time and with increased initial training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15647491      PMCID: PMC6725486          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4218-04.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  22 in total

1.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  Memory involves far more than 'consolidation'.

Authors:  R R Miller; L D Matzel
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 3.  Interpretations of retrograde amnesia: old problems redux.

Authors:  P M Millin; E W Moody; D C Riccio
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Retrieval-induced forgetting: evidence for a recall-specific mechanism.

Authors:  M C Anderson; E L Bjork; R A Bjork
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

5.  Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; Z M Pine; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Patterns of regional brain activation associated with different forms of motor learning.

Authors:  M Ghilardi; C Ghez; V Dhawan; J Moeller; M Mentis; T Nakamura; A Antonini; D Eidelberg
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2000-07-14       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Conditions for interference versus facilitation during sequential sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  O Bock; S Schneider; J Bloomberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  From primed to learn: the saturation of repetition priming and the induction of long-term memory.

Authors:  B Hauptmann; A Karni
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2002-05

9.  Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: evidence from an interference study.

Authors:  Christine Tong; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Gone but not forgotten: the transient nature of retrieval-induced forgetting.

Authors:  M D MacLeod; C N Macrae
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-03
View more
  171 in total

1.  Observation learning versus physical practice leads to different consolidation outcomes in a movement timing task.

Authors:  Maxime Trempe; Maxime Sabourin; Hassan Rohbanfard; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Statistically characterizing intra- and inter-individual variability in children with Developmental Coordination Disorder.

Authors:  Bradley R King; Jeffrey R Harring; Marcio A Oliveira; Jane E Clark
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2011-01-31

3.  Context-dependent partitioning of motor learning in bimanual movements.

Authors:  Ian S Howard; James N Ingram; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Dissociating the roles of the cerebellum and motor cortex during adaptive learning: the motor cortex retains what the cerebellum learns.

Authors:  Joseph M Galea; Alejandro Vazquez; Neel Pasricha; Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Brain plasticity related to the consolidation of motor sequence learning and motor adaptation.

Authors:  Karen Debas; Julie Carrier; Pierre Orban; Marc Barakat; Ovidiu Lungu; Gilles Vandewalle; Abdallah Hadj Tahar; Pierre Bellec; Avi Karni; Leslie G Ungerleider; Habib Benali; Julien Doyon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Protection and expression of human motor memories.

Authors:  Sarah E Pekny; Sarah E Criscimagna-Hemminger; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Concurrent adaptation to four different visual rotations.

Authors:  Monika Thomas; Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  The many facets of motor learning and their relevance for Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Lucio Marinelli; Angelo Quartarone; Mark Hallett; Giuseppe Frazzitta; Maria Felice Ghilardi
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Explicit and implicit contributions to learning in a sensorimotor adaptation task.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; John W Krakauer; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Interleaving Motor Sequence Training With High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Facilitates Consolidation.

Authors:  Jost-Julian Rumpf; Luca May; Christopher Fricke; Joseph Classen; Gesa Hartwigsen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.