Literature DB >> 22075071

Critical neural substrates for correcting unexpected trajectory errors and learning from them.

Pratik K Mutha1, Robert L Sainburg, Kathleen Y Haaland.   

Abstract

Our proficiency at any skill is critically dependent on the ability to monitor our performance, correct errors and adapt subsequent movements so that errors are avoided in the future. In this study, we aimed to dissociate the neural substrates critical for correcting unexpected trajectory errors and learning to adapt future movements based on those errors. Twenty stroke patients with focal damage to frontal or parietal regions in the left or right brain hemispheres and 20 healthy controls performed a task in which a novel mapping between actual hand motion and its visual feedback was introduced. Only patients with frontal damage in the right hemisphere failed to correct for this discrepancy during the ongoing movement. However, these patients were able to adapt to the distortion such that their movement direction on subsequent trials improved. In contrast, only patients with parietal damage in the left hemisphere showed a clear deficit in movement adaptation, but not in online correction. Left frontal or right parietal damage did not adversely impact upon either process. Our findings thus identify, for the first time, distinct and lateralized neural substrates critical for correcting unexpected errors during ongoing movements and error-based movement adaptation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22075071      PMCID: PMC3235559          DOI: 10.1093/brain/awr275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  60 in total

1.  Functional anatomy of nonvisual feedback loops during reaching: a positron emission tomography study.

Authors:  M Desmurget; H Gréa; J S Grethe; C Prablanc; G E Alexander; S T Grafton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching.

Authors:  R L Sainburg; D Kalakanis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Voluntary modification of automatic arm movements evoked by motion of a visual target.

Authors:  B L Day; I N Lyon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Patterns of regional brain activation associated with different forms of motor learning.

Authors:  M Ghilardi; C Ghez; V Dhawan; J Moeller; M Mentis; T Nakamura; A Antonini; D Eidelberg
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2000-07-14       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Handedness: dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics.

Authors:  Leia B Bagesteiro; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Action and awareness in pointing tasks.

Authors:  Helen Johnson; Robert J Van Beers; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-09-07       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  The left parietal and premotor cortices: motor attention and selection.

Authors:  M F S Rushworth; H Johansen-Berg; S M Göbel; J T Devlin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Throwing while looking through prisms. I. Focal olivocerebellar lesions impair adaptation.

Authors:  T A Martin; J G Keating; H P Goodkin; A J Bastian; W T Thach
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Intracranial EEG reveals a time- and frequency-specific role for the right inferior frontal gyrus and primary motor cortex in stopping initiated responses.

Authors:  Nicole Swann; Nitin Tandon; Ryan Canolty; Timothy M Ellmore; Linda K McEvoy; Stephen Dreyer; Michael DiSano; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  31 in total

1.  Relationship of diminished interjoint coordination after stroke to hand path consistency.

Authors:  Geetanjali Gera; Sandra Maria Sbeghen Ferreira Freitas; John Peter Scholz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  The effects of brain lateralization on motor control and adaptation.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Kathleen Y Haaland; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Divisively Normalized Integration of Multisensory Error Information Develops Motor Memories Specific to Vision and Proprioception.

Authors:  Takuji Hayashi; Yutaro Kato; Daichi Nozaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Frontal and parietal cortex contributions to action modification.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Lee H Stapp; Robert L Sainburg; Kathleen Y Haaland
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Functional Deficits in the Less-Impaired Arm of Stroke Survivors Depend on Hemisphere of Damage and Extent of Paretic Arm Impairment.

Authors:  Candice Maenza; David C Good; Carolee J Winstein; David A Wagstaff; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 3.919

6.  Mechanistic determinants of effector-independent motor memory encoding.

Authors:  Adarsh Kumar; Gaurav Panthi; Rechu Divakar; Pratik K Mutha
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Arm dominance affects feedforward strategy more than feedback sensitivity during a postural task.

Authors:  Elise H E Walker; Eric J Perreault
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Structural learning in feedforward and feedback control.

Authors:  Nada Yousif; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Contralesional motor deficits after unilateral stroke reflect hemisphere-specific control mechanisms.

Authors:  Saandeep Mani; Pratik K Mutha; Andrzej Przybyla; Kathleen Y Haaland; David C Good; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Handedness can be explained by a serial hybrid control scheme.

Authors:  V Yadav; R L Sainburg
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.