Literature DB >> 18702588

Experience-dependent enhancement of linguistic pitch representation in the brainstem is not specific to a speech context.

Ananthanarayan Krishnan1, Jayaganesh Swaminathan, Jackson T Gandour.   

Abstract

Neural representation of pitch is influenced by lifelong experiences with music and language at both cortical and subcortical levels of processing. The aim of this article is to determine whether neural plasticity for pitch representation at the level of the brainstem is dependent upon specific dimensions of pitch contours that commonly occur as part of a native listener's language experience. Brainstem frequency following responses (FFRs) were recorded from Chinese and English participants in response to four Mandarin tonal contours presented in a nonspeech context in the form of iterated rippled noise. Pitch strength (whole contour, 250 msec; 40-msec segments) and pitch-tracking accuracy (whole contour) were extracted from the FFRs using autocorrelation algorithms. Narrow band spectrograms were used to extract spectral information. Results showed that the Chinese group exhibits smoother pitch tracking than the English group in three out of the four tones. Moreover, cross-language comparisons of pitch strength of 40-msec segments revealed that the Chinese group exhibits more robust pitch representation of those segments containing rapidly changing pitch movements across all four tones. FFR spectral data were complementary showing that the Chinese group exhibits stronger representation of multiple pitch-relevant harmonics relative to the English group across all four tones. These findings support the view that at early preattentive stages of subcortical processing, neural mechanisms underlying pitch representation are shaped by particular dimensions of the auditory stream rather than speech per se. Adopting a temporal correlation analysis scheme for pitch encoding, we propose that long-term experience sharpens the tuning characteristics of neurons along the pitch axis with enhanced sensitivity to linguistically relevant variations in pitch.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18702588      PMCID: PMC4373537          DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  62 in total

1.  The corticofugal system for hearing: recent progress.

Authors:  N Suga; E Gao; Y Zhang; X Ma; J F Olsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Encoding of the temporal regularity of sound in the human brainstem.

Authors:  T D Griffiths; S Uppenkamp; I Johnsrude; O Josephs; R D Patterson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 3.  Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok; David Poeppel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004 May-Jun

4.  Applications of static and dynamic iterated rippled noise to evaluate pitch encoding in the human auditory brainstem.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Yisheng Xu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 5.  Neural processing and representation of periodicity pitch.

Authors:  G Langner
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1997

6.  Biosonar and neural computation in bats.

Authors:  N Suga
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.142

7.  Discrimination of fundamental frequency contours in synthetic speech: implications for models of pitch perception.

Authors:  D H Klatt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Differential brainstem pathways for the conduction of auditory frequency-following responses.

Authors:  J T Marsh; W S Brown; J C Smith
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1974-04

9.  Frequencies dominant in the perception of the pitch of complex sounds.

Authors:  R J Ritsma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The human frequency-following response: its behavior during continuous tone and tone burst stimulation.

Authors:  E M Glaser; C M Suter; R Dasheiff; A Goldberg
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-01
View more
  55 in total

1.  Neural representation of pitch salience in the human brainstem revealed by psychophysical and electrophysiological indices.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Gavin M Bidelman; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Linguistic status of timbre influences pitch encoding in the brainstem.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Gavin M Bidelman; Christopher J Smalt
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Human inferior colliculus activity relates to individual differences in spoken language learning.

Authors:  Bharath Chandrasekaran; Nina Kraus; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Subcortical plasticity following perceptual learning in a pitch discrimination task.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-28

5.  LANGUAGE EXPERIENCE SHAPES PROCESSING OF PITCH RELEVANT INFORMATION IN THE HUMAN BRAINSTEM AND AUDITORY CORTEX: ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Acoust Aust       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.500

6.  Language-dependent changes in pitch-relevant neural activity in the auditory cortex reflect differential weighting of temporal attributes of pitch contours.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Yi Xu; Chandan H Suresh
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 1.710

7.  Common and distinct neural substrates for the perception of speech rhythm and intonation.

Authors:  Linjun Zhang; Hua Shu; Fengying Zhou; Xiaoyi Wang; Ping Li
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Reading and subcortical auditory function.

Authors:  Karen Banai; Jane Hornickel; Erika Skoe; Trent Nicol; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 9.  Auditory brain stem response to complex sounds: a tutorial.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Brainstem pitch representation in native speakers of Mandarin is less susceptible to degradation of stimulus temporal regularity.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.