Literature DB >> 28807860

Hidden Markov modeling of frequency-following responses to Mandarin lexical tones.

Fernando Llanos1, Zilong Xie1, Bharath Chandrasekaran2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The frequency-following response (FFR) is a scalp-recorded electrophysiological potential reflecting phase-locked activity from neural ensembles in the auditory system. The FFR is often used to assess the robustness of subcortical pitch processing. Due to low signal-to-noise ratio at the single-trial level, FFRs are typically averaged across thousands of stimulus repetitions. Prior work using this approach has shown that subcortical encoding of linguistically-relevant pitch patterns is modulated by long-term language experience. NEW
METHOD: We examine the extent to which a machine learning approach using hidden Markov modeling (HMM) can be utilized to decode Mandarin tone-categories from scalp-record electrophysiolgical activity. We then assess the extent to which the HMM can capture biologically-relevant effects (language experience-driven plasticity). To this end, we recorded FFRs to four Mandarin tones from 14 adult native speakers of Chinese and 14 of native English. We trained a HMM to decode tone categories from the FFRs with varying size of averages. RESULTS AND COMPARISONS WITH EXISTING
METHODS: Tone categories were decoded with above-chance accuracies using HMM. The HMM derived metric (decoding accuracy) revealed a robust effect of language experience, such that FFRs from native Chinese speakers yielded greater accuracies than native English speakers. Critically, the language experience-driven plasticity was captured with average sizes significantly smaller than those used in the extant literature.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the feasibility of HMM in assessing the robustness of neural pitch. Machine-learning approaches can complement extant analytical methods that capture auditory function and could reduce the number of trials needed to capture biological phenomena.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Frequency-following response; Hidden markov model; Machine learning; Pitch encoding; Plasticity

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28807860      PMCID: PMC5610945          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  47 in total

1.  Musicians have enhanced subcortical auditory and audiovisual processing of speech and music.

Authors:  Gabriella Musacchia; Mikko Sams; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  An integrative model of subcortical auditory plasticity.

Authors:  Bharath Chandrasekaran; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Multichannel recordings of the human brainstem frequency-following response: scalp topography, source generators, and distinctions from the transient ABR.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  The layering of auditory experiences in driving experience-dependent subcortical plasticity.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Cross-linguistic comparison of frequency-following responses to voice pitch in American and Chinese neonates and adults.

Authors:  Fuh-Cherng Jeng; Jiong Hu; Brenda Dickman; Karen Montgomery-Reagan; Meiling Tong; Guangqiang Wu; Chia-Der Lin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 6.  Adaptive auditory plasticity in developing and adult animals.

Authors:  Alex S Keuroghlian; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2007-04-08       Impact factor: 11.685

7.  Experience-dependent neural representation of dynamic pitch in the brainstem.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Gavin M Bidelman; Jayaganesh Swaminathan
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Sources of frequency following responses (FFR) in man.

Authors:  H Sohmer; H Pratt; R Kinarti
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1977-05

9.  Brainstem encoding of speech and musical stimuli in congenital amusia: evidence from Cantonese speakers.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Akshay R Maggu; Joseph C Y Lau; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Deviance-Related Responses along the Auditory Hierarchy: Combined FFR, MLR and MMN Evidence.

Authors:  Tetsuya Shiga; Heike Althen; Miriam Cornella; Katarzyna Zarnowiec; Hirooki Yabe; Carles Escera
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Machine Learning Approaches to Analyze Speech-Evoked Neurophysiological Responses.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; Rachel Reetzke; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation selectively enhances speech category learning in adults.

Authors:  Matthew K Leonard; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Fernando Llanos; Jacie R McHaney; William L Schuerman; Han G Yi
Journal:  NPJ Sci Learn       Date:  2020-08-06

3.  Biometric identification of listener identity from frequency following responses to speech.

Authors:  Fernando Llanos; Zilong Xie; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  The emergence of idiosyncratic patterns in the frequency-following response during the first year of life.

Authors:  Fernando Llanos; T Christina Zhao; Patricia K Kuhl; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  JASA Express Lett       Date:  2022-05-10

5.  Rapid Enhancement of Subcortical Neural Responses to Sine-Wave Speech.

Authors:  Fan-Yin Cheng; Can Xu; Lisa Gold; Spencer Smith
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Frequency-Following Responses to Speech Sounds Are Highly Conserved across Species and Contain Cortical Contributions.

Authors:  G Nike Gnanateja; Kyle Rupp; Fernando Llanos; Madison Remick; Marianny Pernia; Srivatsun Sadagopan; Tobias Teichert; Taylor J Abel; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-12-23

7.  Language experience during the sensitive period narrows infants' sensory encoding of lexical tones-Music intervention reverses it.

Authors:  Tian Christina Zhao; Fernando Llanos; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Patricia K Kuhl
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 3.473

8.  Non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation selectively enhances speech category learning in adults.

Authors:  Matthew K Leonard; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Fernando Llanos; Jacie R McHaney; William L Schuerman; Han G Yi
Journal:  NPJ Sci Learn       Date:  2020-08-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.