Literature DB >> 16230893

Brain stem response to speech: a biological marker of auditory processing.

Krista L Johnson1, Trent G Nicol, Nina Kraus.   

Abstract

The auditory brain stem response to speech mimics the acoustic characteristics of the speech signal with remarkable fidelity. This makes it possible to derive from it considerable theoretical and clinically applicable information relevant to auditory processing of complex stimuli. Years of research have led to the current characterization of these neural events with respect to the underlying acoustic information they reflect. The majority of data reviewed here originates from studies using a /da/ syllable to elicit the brain stem response, which consists of transient and periodic (frequency following) neural activity. We describe how the human auditory brain stem response separately encodes source and filter characteristics of the acoustic signal, which reflects paralinguistic and linguistic information simultaneously conveyed in speech. In normal-hearing individuals, these two classes of response components (source and filter) are highly correlated within a class but not between classes. This response dissociation becomes pronounced when stimuli are presented in background noise or with faster stimulus rates. In addition, some learning-impaired children show a selective deficiency in the neural encoding of acoustic features associated with the filter characteristics of speech. These children show no deficits in the encoding of source components, further supporting the notion of separate neural mechanisms. Overall, the auditory brain stem response to speech provides a way to access subcortical auditory processing mechanisms and may be used as a biological marker of deficient sound encoding associated with learning and auditory processing disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16230893     DOI: 10.1097/01.aud.0000179687.71662.6e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  66 in total

1.  What is the role of the medial olivocochlear system in speech-in-noise processing?

Authors:  Jessica de Boer; A Roger D Thornton; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Speech evoked auditory brainstem responses: a new tool to study brainstem encoding of speech sounds.

Authors:  Sujeet Kumar Sinha; Vijayalakshmi Basavaraj
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-01-11

3.  Musicians and tone-language speakers share enhanced brainstem encoding but not perceptual benefits for musical pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Jackson T Gandour; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Forward Masking of the Speech-Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Sarah E Hodge; Denise C Menezes; Kevin D Brown; John H Grose
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Seasonal variation in avian auditory evoked responses to tones: a comparative analysis of Carolina chickadees, tufted titmice, and white-breasted nuthatches.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Lucas; Todd M Freeberg; Glenis R Long; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Musical experience shapes human brainstem encoding of linguistic pitch patterns.

Authors:  Patrick C M Wong; Erika Skoe; Nicole M Russo; Tasha Dees; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-03-11       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 7.  Subcortical pathways: Towards a better understanding of auditory disorders.

Authors:  Richard A Felix; Boris Gourévitch; Christine V Portfors
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Reading and subcortical auditory function.

Authors:  Karen Banai; Jane Hornickel; Erika Skoe; Trent Nicol; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Emotion and the auditory brainstem response to speech.

Authors:  Jade Q Wang; Trent Nicol; Erika Skoe; Mikko Sams; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Emotion modulates early auditory response to speech.

Authors:  Jade Wang; Trent Nicol; Erika Skoe; Mikko Sams; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.