Literature DB >> 8609290

A time domain description for the pitch strength of iterated rippled noise.

W A Yost1, R Patterson, S Sheft.   

Abstract

Two versions of a cascaded add, attenuate, and delay circuit were used to generate iterated rippled noise (IRN) stimuli. IRN stimuli produce a repetition pitch whose strength relative to the noise can be varied by changing the type of circuit, the attenuation, or the number of iterations in the circuit. Listeners were asked to discriminate between various pairs of IRN stimuli which differed in the type of network used to generate the sounds or the number of iterations (n = 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, and 9). Performance was determined for IRN stimuli generated with delays of 2, 4, and 8 ms and for four bandpass filter conditions (0-2000, 250-2000, 500-2000, and 750-2000 Hz). Some IRN stimuli were extremely difficult to discriminate despite relatively large spectral differences, while other IRN stimuli produced readily discriminable changes in perception, despite small spectral differences. these contrasting results are inconsistent with simple spectral explanations for the perception of IRN stimuli. An explanation based on the first peak of the autocorrelation function of IRN stimuli is consistent with the results. Simulations of the processing performed by the peripheral auditory system (i.e., interval histograms and correlograms) produce results which are consistent with the involvement of these temporal processes in the perception of IRN stimuli.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8609290     DOI: 10.1121/1.414593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  37 in total

1.  Pitch strength of normal and dysphonic voices.

Authors:  Rahul Shrivastav; David A Eddins; Supraja Anand
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Some problems in the measurement of the frequency-resolving ability of hearing.

Authors:  A Ya Supin
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-10

3.  Pitch strength of regular-interval click trains with different length "runs" of regular intervals.

Authors:  William A Yost; Dan Mapes-Riordan; William Shofner; Raymond Dye; Stanley Sheft
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  An autocorrelation model with place dependence to account for the effect of harmonic number on fundamental frequency discrimination.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Cortical representations of pitch in monkeys and humans.

Authors:  Daniel Bendor; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Relative influence of musical and linguistic experience on early cortical processing of pitch contours.

Authors:  Bharath Chandrasekaran; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Further evidence that fundamental-frequency difference limens measure pitch discrimination.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Claire M Ryan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Iterated rippled noise discrimination at long durations.

Authors:  William A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Perception of pure tones and iterated rippled noise for normal hearing and cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Richard T Penninger; Wade W Chien; Patpong Jiradejvong; Emily Boeke; Courtney L Carver; Charles J Limb
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-03

10.  Representation of the spectral dominance region of pitch in the steady-state temporal discharge patterns of cochlear nucleus units.

Authors:  William P Shofner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.