Literature DB >> 21198980

Enhanced brainstem encoding predicts musicians' perceptual advantages with pitch.

Gavin M Bidelman1, Ananthanarayan Krishnan, Jackson T Gandour.   

Abstract

Important to Western tonal music is the relationship between pitches both within and between musical chords; melody and harmony are generated by combining pitches selected from the fixed hierarchical scales of music. It is of critical importance that musicians have the ability to detect and discriminate minute deviations in pitch in order to remain in tune with other members of their ensemble. Event-related potentials indicate that cortical mechanisms responsible for detecting mistuning and violations in pitch are more sensitive and accurate in musicians as compared with non-musicians. The aim of the present study was to address whether this superiority is also present at a subcortical stage of pitch processing. Brainstem frequency-following responses were recorded from musicians and non-musicians in response to tuned (i.e. major and minor) and detuned (± 4% difference in frequency) chordal arpeggios differing only in the pitch of their third. Results showed that musicians had faster neural synchronization and stronger brainstem encoding for defining characteristics of musical sequences regardless of whether they were in or out of tune. In contrast, non-musicians had relatively strong representation for major/minor chords but showed diminished responses for detuned chords. The close correspondence between the magnitude of brainstem responses and performance on two behavioral pitch discrimination tasks supports the idea that musicians' enhanced detection of chordal mistuning may be rooted at pre-attentive, sensory stages of processing. Findings suggest that perceptually salient aspects of musical pitch are not only represented at subcortical levels but that these representations are also enhanced by musical experience.
© 2010 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience © 2010 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21198980      PMCID: PMC3059719          DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07527.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  56 in total

1.  Stronger bilateral efferent influences on cochlear biomechanical activity in musicians than in non-musicians.

Authors:  X Perrot; C Micheyl; S Khalfa; L Collet
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1999-03-12       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 2.  Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok; David Poeppel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004 May-Jun

3.  Enhancement of auditory-evoked potentials in musicians reflects an influence of expertise but not selective attention.

Authors:  Simon Baumann; Martin Meyer; Lutz Jäncke
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Musical experience limits the degradative effects of background noise on the neural processing of sound.

Authors:  Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Top-down modulation of auditory processing: effects of sound context, musical expertise and attentional focus.

Authors:  M Tervaniemi; S Kruck; W De Baene; E Schröger; K Alter; A D Friederici
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 6.  Neural processing and representation of periodicity pitch.

Authors:  G Langner
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1997

7.  Medial olivocochlear system and loudness adaptation: differences between musicians and non-musicians.

Authors:  C Micheyl; O Carbonnel; L Collet
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Perception of pitch and timbre by musically trained and untrained listeners.

Authors:  M A Pitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Neural correlates of consonance, dissonance, and the hierarchy of musical pitch in the human brainstem.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Experience-dependent neural representation of dynamic pitch in the brainstem.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Gavin M Bidelman; Jayaganesh Swaminathan
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 1.837

View more
  36 in total

1.  Musicians and tone-language speakers share enhanced brainstem encoding but not perceptual benefits for musical pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Jackson T Gandour; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Normal hearing is not enough to guarantee robust encoding of suprathreshold features important in everyday communication.

Authors:  Dorea Ruggles; Hari Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Inherent auditory skills rather than formal music training shape the neural encoding of speech.

Authors:  Kelsey Mankel; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Linguistic, perceptual, and cognitive factors underlying musicians' benefits in noise-degraded speech perception.

Authors:  Jessica Yoo; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Musicians at the Cocktail Party: Neural Substrates of Musical Training During Selective Listening in Multispeaker Situations.

Authors:  Sebastian Puschmann; Sylvain Baillet; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Musicians have enhanced audiovisual multisensory binding: experience-dependent effects in the double-flash illusion.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Musical experts recruit action-related neural structures in harmonic anomaly detection: evidence for embodied cognition in expertise.

Authors:  Jason Sherwin; Paul Sajda
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Similar abilities of musicians and non-musicians to segregate voices by fundamental frequency.

Authors:  Mickael L D Deroche; Charles J Limb; Monita Chatterjee; Vincent L Gracco
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The ability to move to a beat is linked to the consistency of neural responses to sound.

Authors:  Adam Tierney; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Cortical and subcortical processing of short duration speech stimuli in trained rock musicians: a pilot study.

Authors:  Prawin Kumar; Sam Publius Anil; Vibhu Grover; Himanshu Kumar Sanju; Sachchidanand Sinha
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.