Literature DB >> 19118109

Reflex control of the human inner ear: a half-octave offset in medial efferent feedback that is consistent with an efferent role in the control of masking.

Watjana Lilaonitkul1, John J Guinan.   

Abstract

The high sensitivity and frequency selectivity of the mammalian cochlea is due to amplification produced by outer hair cells (OHCs) and controlled by medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferents. Data from animals led to the view that MOC fibers provide frequency-specific inhibitory feedback; however, these studies did not measure intact MOC reflexes. To test whether MOC inhibition is primarily at the frequency that elicits the MOC activity, acoustically elicited MOC effects were quantified in humans by the change in otoacoustic emissions produced by 60-dB SPL tone and half-octave-band noise elicitors at different frequencies relative to a 40-dB SPL, 1-kHz probe tone. On average, all elicitors produced MOC effects that were skewed (elicitor frequencies -1 octave below the probe produced larger effects than those -1 octave above). The largest MOC effects were from elicitors below the probe frequency for contra- and bilateral elicitors but were from elicitors centered at the probe frequency for ipsilateral elicitors. Typically, ipsilateral elicitors produced larger effects than contralateral elicitors and bilateral elicitors produced effects near the ipsi+contra sum. Elicitors at levels down to 30-dB SPL produced similar patterns. Tuning curves (TCs) interpolated from these data were V-shaped with Q10s approximately 2. These are sharper than MOC-fiber TCs found near 1 kHz in cats and guinea pigs. Because cochlear amplification is skewed (more below the best frequency of a cochlear region), these data are consistent with an anti-masking role of MOC efferents that reduces masking by reducing the cochlear amplification seen at 1 kHz.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19118109      PMCID: PMC2666406          DOI: 10.1152/jn.90925.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  58 in total

1.  The effect of noise bandwidth on the contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  D S Velenovsky; T J Glattke
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Measurement of the distribution of medial olivocochlear acoustic reflex strengths across normal-hearing individuals via otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Bradford C Backus; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-10-12

3.  Comparing stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions measured by compression, suppression, and spectral smoothing.

Authors:  Radha Kalluri; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Relationship between auditory intensity discrimination in noise and olivocochlear efferent system activity in humans.

Authors:  C Micheyl; X Perrot; L Collet
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.912

5.  Effects of contralateral sound on auditory-nerve responses. II. Dependence on stimulus variables.

Authors:  E H Warren; M C Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Interrelation of different oto-acoustic emissions.

Authors:  E Zwicker; E Schloth
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Efferent neural control of cochlear mechanics? Olivocochlear bundle stimulation affects cochlear biomechanical nonlinearity.

Authors:  J H Siegel; D O Kim
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  On the role of the olivocochlear bundle in hearing: 16 case studies.

Authors:  B Scharf; J Magnan; A Chays
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Morphology and response properties of single olivocochlear fibers in the guinea pig.

Authors:  M C Brown
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1989-06-15       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Immunocytochemical detection of choline acetyltransferase in the human organ of Corti.

Authors:  A Schrott-Fischer; G Egg; W J Kong; N Renard; M Eybalin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  42 in total

1.  Individual differences in behavioral estimates of cochlear nonlinearities.

Authors:  Gayla L Poling; Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-22

2.  Frequency tuning of the contralateral medial olivocochlear reflex in humans.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Auditory enhancement of increments in spectral amplitude stems from more than one source.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Catherine Semal; Laurent Demany
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-07-06

4.  The time course of cochlear gain reduction measured using a more efficient psychophysical technique.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Recovery from on- and off-frequency forward masking in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Properties of a nonlinear version of the stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission.

Authors:  Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Otoacoustic-emission-based medial-olivocochlear reflex assays for humans.

Authors:  Lynne Marshall; Judi A Lapsley Miller; John J Guinan; Christopher A Shera; Charlotte M Reed; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne; Paul Boege
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Exploring the role of feedback-based auditory reflexes in forward masking by schroeder-phase complexes.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Jordan A Beim; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-22

9.  Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Provide No Evidence for the Role of Efferents in the Enhancement Effect.

Authors:  Jordan A Beim; Maxwell Elliott; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-08

10.  Exploring the Role of Medial Olivocochlear Efferents on the Detection of Amplitude Modulation for Tones Presented in Noise.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Alix M Klang; Nathan T Torunsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-05-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.