Literature DB >> 20136218

Properties of a nonlinear version of the stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission.

Kyle P Walsh1, Edward G Pasanen, Dennis McFadden.   

Abstract

A procedure for extracting the nonlinear component of the stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission (SFOAE) is described. This nSFOAE measures the amount by which the cochlear response deviates from linear additivity when the input stimulus is doubled in amplitude. When a 4.0-kHz tone was presented alone, the magnitude of the nSFOAE response remained essentially constant throughout the 400-ms duration of the tone; response magnitude did increase monotonically with increasing tone level. When a wideband noise was presented alone, nSFOAE magnitude increased over the initial 100- to 200-ms portion of the 400-ms duration of the noise. When the tone and the wideband noise were presented simultaneously, nSFOAE magnitude decreased momentarily, then increased substantially for about the first 100 ms and then remained strong for the remainder of the presentation. Manipulations of the noise bandwidth revealed that the low-frequency components were primarily responsible for this rising, dynamic response; no rising segment was seen with bandpass or highpass noise. The rising, dynamic nSFOAE response is likely attributable to activation of the medial olivocochlear efferent system. This perstimulatory emission appears to have the potential to provide information about the earliest stages of auditory processing for stimuli commonly used in psychoacoustical tasks.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20136218      PMCID: PMC2830262          DOI: 10.1121/1.3279832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  25 in total

1.  Distortion product emissions in humans. II. Relations to acoustic immittance and stimulus frequency and spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing subjects.

Authors:  B L Lonsbury-Martin; F P Harris; B B Stagner; M D Hawkins; G K Martin
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1990-05

2.  Simultaneous recording of stimulus-frequency and distortion-product otoacoustic emission input-output functions in human ears.

Authors:  Kim S Schairer; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Simultaneous measurement of noise-activated middle-ear muscle reflex and stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Shawn S Goodman; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-03-28

4.  Time-course of the human medial olivocochlear reflex.

Authors:  Bradford C Backus; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  A review of otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  R Probst; B L Lonsbury-Martin; G K Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Slow variations of the amplitude and frequency of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  M L Whitehead
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Effect of masker level on overshoot in running- and frozen-noise maskers.

Authors:  R von Klitzing; A Kohlrausch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Interrelation of different oto-acoustic emissions.

Authors:  E Zwicker; E Schloth
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Towards a model for the origin of cochlear echoes.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Otoacoustic emissions and quinine sulfate.

Authors:  D McFadden; E G Pasanen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  12 in total

1.  Auditory enhancement of increments in spectral amplitude stems from more than one source.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Catherine Semal; Laurent Demany
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-07-06

2.  The time course of cochlear gain reduction measured using a more efficient psychophysical technique.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Overshoot using very short signal delays.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Erin M Grenwelge
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Changes in otoacoustic emissions during selective auditory and visual attention.

Authors:  Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Overshoot measured physiologically and psychophysically in the same human ears.

Authors:  Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Spatial and temporal disparity in signals and maskers affects signal detection in non-human primates.

Authors:  Francesca Rocchi; Margit E Dylla; Peter A Bohlen; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 7.  Cochlear efferent innervation and function.

Authors:  John J Guinan
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.064

8.  Selective attention reduces physiological noise in the external ear canals of humans. I: auditory attention.

Authors:  Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Selective attention reduces physiological noise in the external ear canals of humans. II: visual attention.

Authors:  Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  The role of compression in the simultaneous masker phase effect.

Authors:  Hisaaki Tabuchi; Bernhard Laback; Thibaud Necciari; Piotr Majdak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.