Literature DB >> 7061350

Efferent neural control of cochlear mechanics? Olivocochlear bundle stimulation affects cochlear biomechanical nonlinearity.

J H Siegel, D O Kim.   

Abstract

We confirm the report of Mountain (Mountain, D.C. (1980): Science 210, 77-72) that stimulating the crossed olivocochlear bundle (COCB) can change the magnitude of the distortion product (f2-f1) in the ear-canal sound pressure. Our results are extended to include (2f1-f2) as well as (f2-f1) from anesthetized chinchillas with both middle-ear muscles sectioned. In contrast to Mountain's report, the polarity of the change can be either positive, negative or absent, depending on the choice of two-tone stimulus frequencies. The influence of two-tone stimulus level is also complex, but we have not yet seen the polarity of the COCB effect change with stimulus level. The magnitude and polarity of the change in (2f1-f2) are not simply related to those for (f2-f1). The effect of COCB stimulation is abolished when scala tympani is perfused with artificial perilymph containing 10(-5) M d-tubocurarine. These results demonstrate that the COCB effect is postsynaptic, probably mediated by outer hair cells. We suggest that the normal cochlea contains an active biomechanical mechanism which reduces the damping of the cochlear-partition motion and is modulated by activating the efferents. It is thus possible that the central nervous system may be able to control the dynamics of the motion of the cochlear partition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7061350     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(82)90052-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  50 in total

1.  The corticofugal system for hearing: recent progress.

Authors:  N Suga; E Gao; Y Zhang; X Ma; J F Olsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  A multifrequency method for determining cochlear efferent activity.

Authors:  Anne E Luebke; Paul K Foster; Barden B Stagner
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2002-03

Review 4.  Protection from acoustic trauma is not a primary function of the medial olivocochlear efferent system.

Authors:  E Christopher Kirk; David W Smith
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-06-06

5.  Basilar membrane responses to two-tone and broadband stimuli.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; L Robles; N C Rich; A Recio
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1992-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Medial olivocochlear reflex interneurons are located in the posteroventral cochlear nucleus: a kainic acid lesion study in guinea pigs.

Authors:  Ronald K de Venecia; M Charles Liberman; John J Guinan; M Christian Brown
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Simultaneous measurement of noise-activated middle-ear muscle reflex and stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Shawn S Goodman; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-03-28

8.  Auditory filter tuning inferred with short sinusoidal and notched-noise maskers.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Cochlear-motor, transduction and signal-transfer tinnitus: models for three types of cochlear tinnitus.

Authors:  H P Zenner; A Ernst
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Differentiating Middle Ear and Medial Olivocochlear Effects on Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions.

Authors:  Kendra L Marks; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.