Literature DB >> 22457463

Frequency tuning of the contralateral medial olivocochlear reflex in humans.

Wei Zhao1, Sumitrajit Dhar.   

Abstract

Activation of the medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferents attenuates cochlear gain and reduces the amplitudes of mechanical, electrical, and neural cochlear outputs. The functional roles of the MOC efferents are not fully understood, especially in humans, despite postulations that they are involved in protection against acoustic trauma, facilitation of transient-sound perception, etc. Delineating the frequency tuning properties of the MOC efferents would provide critical evidence to support or refute these postulated functional roles. By utilizing spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs), a cochlear measure sensitive to MOC modulation, we systematically demonstrate in humans that the contralateral MOC reflex is tuned to a fixed frequency band between 500 and 1,000 Hz independent of SOAE frequency. Our results question the role of the MOC reflex in protection against acoustic trauma or facilitation of transient-sound perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22457463      PMCID: PMC3434611          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00051.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  33 in total

1.  Responses of medial olivocochlear neurons. Specifying the central pathways of the medial olivocochlear reflex.

Authors:  M C Brown; R K de Venecia; J J Guinan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Brainstem location of efferent neurones projecting to the guinea pig cochlea.

Authors:  D Robertson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Effects of electric stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on single auditory-nerve fibers in the cat.

Authors:  M L Wiederhold; N Y Kiang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1970-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Variations in the effects of electric stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on cat single auditory-nerve-fiber responses to tone bursts.

Authors:  M L Wiederhold
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1970-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Active hair-bundle movements can amplify a hair cell's response to oscillatory mechanical stimuli.

Authors:  P Martin; A J Hudspeth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Topographic organization of the olivocochlear projections from the lateral and medial zones of the superior olivary complex.

Authors:  J J Guinan; W B Warr; B E Norris
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1984-06-10       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Changes in endolymphatic potential and crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation alter cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  D C Mountain
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-10-03       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Evidence of mechanical nonlinearity and frequency selective wave amplification in the cochlea.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1979

9.  Morphology and response properties of single olivocochlear fibers in the guinea pig.

Authors:  M C Brown
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1989-06-15       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Horseradish peroxidase injection of physiologically characterized afferent and efferent neurones in the guinea pig spiral ganglion.

Authors:  D Robertson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  15 in total

1.  Click-Evoked Auditory Efferent Activity: Rate and Level Effects.

Authors:  Sriram Boothalingam; Julianne Kurke; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-07

2.  Auditory attentional filter in the absence of masking noise.

Authors:  Elan Selvi Anandan; Ruby Husain; Kumar Seluakumaran
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and hearing threshold fine structure.

Authors:  James B Dewey; Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-23

Review 4.  Olivocochlear efferents: Their action, effects, measurement and uses, and the impact of the new conception of cochlear mechanical responses.

Authors:  John J Guinan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  No effects of attention or visual perceptual load on cochlear function, as measured with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Jordan A Beim; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions Reveal an Efficient Auditory Efferent Network.

Authors:  Viorica Marian; Tuan Q Lam; Sayuri Hayakawa; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Efferent modulation of pre-neural and neural distortion products.

Authors:  S B Smith; K Ichiba; D S Velenovsky; B Cone
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Cochlear Delay and Medial Olivocochlear Functioning in Children with Suspected Auditory Processing Disorder.

Authors:  Sriram Boothalingam; Chris Allan; Prudence Allen; David Purcell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Stronger efferent suppression of cochlear neural potentials by contralateral acoustic stimulation in awake than in anesthetized chinchilla.

Authors:  Cristian Aedo; Eduardo Tapia; Elizabeth Pavez; Diego Elgueda; Paul H Delano; Luis Robles
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-02

10.  Effect of Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Feedback on Perceptual Estimates of Cochlear Gain and Compression.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Katrin Krumbholz; Jessica de Boer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.