Literature DB >> 9267657

Relationship between auditory intensity discrimination in noise and olivocochlear efferent system activity in humans.

C Micheyl1, X Perrot, L Collet.   

Abstract

Recent physiological data in animals suggest a role of the medial olivocochlear system (MOCS) in auditory intensity discrimination in noise. In this study, the existence of statistical relationships between intensity difference limens (IDLs) and MOCS functioning was tested in humans. IDLs were measured in conditions of quiet and of ipsilateral, contralateral, and dichotic noise. MOCS functioning was assessed through the contralateral evoked otoacoustic emission (EOAE) amplitude attenuation effect. A first finding was that IDLs measured in the presence of ipsilateral noise were reduced when contralateral noise was added. Furthermore, the observed shift in IDL appeared to be significantly correlated to the contralateral EOAE amplitude attenuation effect. These results support the hypothesis that MOCS functioning plays a role in intensity discrimination in dichotic noise in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9267657     DOI: 10.1037//0735-7044.111.4.801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  16 in total

1.  What is the role of the medial olivocochlear system in speech-in-noise processing?

Authors:  Jessica de Boer; A Roger D Thornton; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The effects of ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral broadband noise on the mid-level hump in intensity discrimination.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of medial olivocochlear efferent stimulation on the activity of neurons in the auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Kumar Seluakumaran; Wilhelmina H A M Mulders; Donald Robertson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Comparing behavioral and physiological measures of combination tones: sex and race differences.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Erin M Leshikar; Michelle D Hsieh; Mindy M Maloney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Stability of the medial olivocochlear reflex as measured by distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Srikanta K Mishra; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and hearing threshold fine structure.

Authors:  James B Dewey; Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-23

7.  Abnormal peripheral auditory asymmetry in schizophrenia.

Authors:  E Veuillet; N Georgieff; B Philibert; J Dalery; M Marie-Cardine; L Collet
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 8.  The nicotinic receptor of cochlear hair cells: a possible pharmacotherapeutic target?

Authors:  Ana Belén Elgoyhen; Eleonora Katz; Paul A Fuchs
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 9.  Efferent Inhibition of the Cochlea.

Authors:  Paul Albert Fuchs; Amanda M Lauer
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 6.915

10.  Reflex control of the human inner ear: a half-octave offset in medial efferent feedback that is consistent with an efferent role in the control of masking.

Authors:  Watjana Lilaonitkul; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.