Literature DB >> 2914807

Effects of contralateral sound on auditory-nerve responses. II. Dependence on stimulus variables.

E H Warren1, M C Liberman.   

Abstract

The suppression by moderate-level contralateral sound of auditory-nerve-fiber responses to ipsilateral stimuli at the characteristic frequency (CF) was studied in barbiturate-anesthetized cats. The dependence of suppression strength on ipsilateral and contralateral stimulus variables, including level, frequency, bandwidth, and timing relationships, was investigated. The principal findings were: (1) Contralateral-sound suppression is greatest when the ipsilateral stimulus level is within the dynamic range of the unit. (2) When the contralateral stimuli are tones, suppression is greatest when the contralateral tone frequency is at or near CF. (3) Units with CFs above 3-4 kHz are only weakly suppressed by contralateral CF tones but more strongly suppressed by contralateral broad-band noise. (4) Continuous contralateral stimuli are significantly more effective suppressors than are gated stimuli. The characteristics of contralateral-sound suppression are compared with the physiology and anatomy of the uncrossed medial olivocochlear efferents, the subset of efferents which are the primary mediators of the effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2914807     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(89)90033-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  29 in total

Review 1.  Protection from acoustic trauma is not a primary function of the medial olivocochlear efferent system.

Authors:  E Christopher Kirk; David W Smith
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-06-06

2.  Effects of contralateral sound stimulation on unit activity of ventral cochlear nucleus neurons.

Authors:  S E Shore; C J Sumner; S C Bledsoe; J Lu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Monaural conductive hearing loss alters the expression of the GluA3 AMPA and glycine receptor α1 subunits in bushy and fusiform cells of the cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  H Wang; G Yin; K Rogers; C Miralles; A L De Blas; M E Rubio
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Frequency tuning of the contralateral medial olivocochlear reflex in humans.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Recovery from on- and off-frequency forward masking in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Auditory processing disorders with and without central auditory discrimination deficits.

Authors:  Alexandra Annemarie Ludwig; Michael Fuchs; Eberhard Kruse; Brigitte Uhlig; Sonja Annette Kotz; Rudolf Rübsamen
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06

7.  Temporal and binaural properties in dorsal cochlear nucleus and its output tract.

Authors:  P X Joris; P H Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Exploring the role of feedback-based auditory reflexes in forward masking by schroeder-phase complexes.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Jordan A Beim; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-22

9.  Notched-noise precursors improve detection of low-frequency amplitude modulation.

Authors:  Ali Almishaal; Gavin M Bidelman; Skyler G Jennings
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Acoustic stimulation of human medial olivocochlear efferents reduces stimulus-frequency and click-evoked otoacoustic emission delays: Implications for cochlear filter bandwidths.

Authors:  Nikolas A Francis; John J Guinan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.