Literature DB >> 19089290

Preload and torque removal evaluation of three different abutment screws for single standing implant restorations.

Rafael Augusto Stüker1, Eduardo Rolim Teixeira, João Carlos Pinheiro Beck, Nilza Pereira da Costa.   

Abstract

Several authors still consider the mechanical problems of fracture and component loosening as the main causes of failure of implant-supported restorations. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the preload of three types of screw for transmucosal abutment attachment used in single implant-supported prosthesis through strain gauge and removal torque measurements. Three external hex fixtures were used, and each received a transmucosal abutment (Cera One), which was fixed to the implant with its respective screw: Group A- gold screw, Group B- titanium screw and Group C- surface-treated titanium screw (Ti-Tite). Ten screws of each type were attached applying a 30.07+/-0.28 Ncm torque force and maintained in position for 5 minutes. After this, the preload values were measured using strain gauges and a measurement cell. Gold screws presented higher preload values (131.72+/-8.98 N), followed by surface-treated titanium screws (97.78+/-4.68 N) and titanium screws (37.03+/-5.69 N). ANOVA (p<0.05) and Tukey's test (p<0.05) were applied. Statistically significant differences were found among the groups for both preload and removal torque values. In conclusion, gold screws may be indicated to achieve superior longevity of the abutment-implant connection and, consequently, prosthetic restoration due to greater preload values yielded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19089290      PMCID: PMC4327281          DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572008000100011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci        ISSN: 1678-7757            Impact factor:   2.698


  9 in total

1.  Implant-abutment screw joint preload of 7 hex-top abutment systems.

Authors:  K B Tan; J I Nicholls
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Finite element analysis to determine implant preload.

Authors:  Lisa A Lang; Byungsik Kang; Rui-Feng Wang; Brien R Lang
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  The effect of repeated torque and salivary contamination on the preload of slotted gold implant prosthetic screws.

Authors:  George K Tzenakis; William W Nagy; Raymond A Fournelle; Virendra B Dhuru
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.426

4.  Effect of lateral cyclic loading on abutment screw loosening of an external hexagon implant system.

Authors:  Ameen Khraisat; Akihiko Hashimoto; Shuichi Nomura; Osamu Miyakawa
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  Preload loss in gold prosthesis-retaining screws as a function of time.

Authors:  Andrew Cantwell; John A Hobkirk
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment screws.

Authors:  J E Haack; R L Sakaguchi; T Sun; J P Coffey
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 7.  Effects of fabrication, finishing, and polishing procedures on preload in prostheses using conventional "gold' and plastic cylinders.

Authors:  A B Carr; J B Brunski; E Hurley
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.

Authors:  S A Hoyer; C M Stanford; S Buranadham; T Fridrich; J Wagner; D Gratton
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.426

9.  The effect of repeated torque on the ultimate tensile strength of slotted gold prosthetic screws.

Authors:  Mohammed A Al Rafee; William W Nagy; Raymond A Fournelle; Virendra B Dhuru; George K Tzenakis; Charles E Pechous
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.426

  9 in total
  15 in total

1.  Removal torque evaluation of three different abutment screws for single implant restorations after mechanical cyclic loading.

Authors:  T Paepoemsin; P A Reichart; P Chaijareenont; F P Strietzel; P Khongkhunthian
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-11-16

Review 2.  Management of abutment screw loosening: review of literature and report of a case.

Authors:  Vinod Krishnan; C Tony Thomas; Ipe Sabu
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-10-25

3.  Evaluation the loosening of abutment screws in fluid contamination: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Fei Sun; Wei Cheng; Bao-Hong Zhao; Gui-Qiu Song; Zeng Lin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Experimental study on the factors affecting torque of beam-type implant torque wrenches.

Authors:  Hiroki Shiba; Yuji Sato; Junichi Furuya; Tokiko Osawa; Akio Isobe; Myu Hayashi; Noboru Kitagawa
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  A rationale method for evaluating unscrewing torque values of prosthetic screws in dental implants.

Authors:  Felipe Miguel Saliba; Mayra Cardoso; Marcelo Ferreira Torres; Alexandre Carvalho Teixeira; Eduardo José Veras Lourenço; Daniel de Moraes Telles
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Resistance of three implant-abutment interfaces to fatigue testing.

Authors:  Cleide Gisele Ribeiro; Maria Luiza Cabral Maia; Susanne S Scherrer; Antonio Carlos Cardoso; H W Anselm Wiskott
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  Effect of abutment screw length and cyclic loading on removal torque in external and internal hex implants.

Authors:  Hnd Hadi Mohammed; Jin-Han Lee; Ji-Myung Bae; Hye-Won Cho
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 8.  Preload loss of abutment screws after dynamic fatigue in single implant-supported restorations. A systematic review.

Authors:  Beatriz Pardal-Peláez; Javier Montero
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-11-01

9.  Effect of the number of abutments on biomechanics of Branemark prosthesis with straight and tilted distal implants.

Authors:  Marcos Michelon Naconecy; Tomás Geremia; André Cervieri; Eduardo Rolim Teixeira; Rosemary Sadami Shinkai
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.698

10.  Evaluation of the accuracy and related factors of the mechanical torque-limiting device for dental implants.

Authors:  Mahmood Kazemi; Ahmad Rohanian; Abbas Monzavi; Mohammad Sadegh Nazari
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2013-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.