Literature DB >> 11432656

Implant-abutment screw joint preload of 7 hex-top abutment systems.

K B Tan1, J I Nicholls.   

Abstract

This study measured the screw joint preload of the implant-abutment interface for 7 common hex-top abutment systems. Increasingly, prosthetic designs are utilizing a direct prosthetic connection to the implant, placing the implant-abutment screw joint under direct functional loads and moments. Sufficiently high screw joint preloads are required to maintain screw joint integrity and confer clinical longevity to implant prosthetic components to prevent such complications as abutment screw loosening and screw fracture. Strain-gauged abutment load cells were calibrated to measure screw joint pre-load at the implant-abutment interface. Torque delivery by electronic torque controller was varied at low- and high-speed settings. At manufacturer's recommended torques, the overall mean preload measured was 181.6 +/- 60.0 N for the Nobel Biocare Standard abutment, 291.3 +/- 41.2 N for the Nobel Biocare EsthetiCone abutment, 456.5 +/- 44.0 N for the Nobel Biocare MirusCone abutment, 369.7 +/- 32.9 N for the 3i Titanium Abutment post, 643.4 +/- 143.1 N for the Nobel Biocare CeraOne abutment, 536.3 +/- 68.6 N for the Nobel Biocare "Gold Cylinder to Fixture" abutment, and 556.9 +/- 145.6 N for the Nobel Biocare TiAdapt abutment. Analysis of variance revealed significant differences between abutment systems (P < .001) and between torque driver speed settings (P < .001). Implant-abutment screw joint preload of external-hex implants is dependent on abutment design, screw diameter, material, tightening torque, and torque controller speed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11432656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  8 in total

1.  External versus internal abutment connection implants: a survey of opinions and decision making among experienced implant dentists in Japan.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Hagiwara; Alan B Carr
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Preload and torque removal evaluation of three different abutment screws for single standing implant restorations.

Authors:  Rafael Augusto Stüker; Eduardo Rolim Teixeira; João Carlos Pinheiro Beck; Nilza Pereira da Costa
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  Experimental study on the factors affecting torque of beam-type implant torque wrenches.

Authors:  Hiroki Shiba; Yuji Sato; Junichi Furuya; Tokiko Osawa; Akio Isobe; Myu Hayashi; Noboru Kitagawa
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  Evaluation of Micromovements and Stresses around Single Wide-Diameter and Double Implants for Replacing Mandibular Molar: A Three-Dimensional FEA.

Authors:  Shrikar R Desai; I Karthikeyan; Rika Singh
Journal:  ISRN Dent       Date:  2012-03-07

5.  Stability of external and internal implant connections after a fatigue test.

Authors:  Paulo Cesar Pinheiro Feitosa; Ana Paula Barbosa de Lima; Laís Regiane Silva-Concílio; William Cunha Brandt; Ana Christina Claro Neves
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2013-07

6.  Effect of dynamic cyclic loading on screw loosening of retightened versus new abutment screw in both narrow and standard implants (in-vitro study).

Authors:  Eman Mohammed Nasr Attiah; Attiah Ali AlGendy; Tamer Mohamed Nasr Mostafa
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2020-07-28

7.  Influence of the implant abutment types and the dynamic loading on initial screw loosening.

Authors:  Eun-Sook Kim; Soo-Yeon Shin
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  3D finite element analysis of immediate loading of single wide versus double implants for replacing mandibular molar.

Authors:  Shrikar R Desai; I Karthikeyan; Reetika Gaddale
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2013-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.