Literature DB >> 19062785

Effect of instrument timbre on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users.

John J Galvin, Qian-Jie Fu, Sandra Oba.   

Abstract

Because of interactions between the signal processing and acoustic input, cochlear implant (CI) users' melodic pitch perception may be influenced by instrument timbre. In the present study, CI listeners' melodic contour identification was measured for six instruments (organ, glockenspiel, trumpet, clarinet, violin, and piano). While performance was generally best with the organ and poorest with the piano, individual CI subjects exhibited different patterns of results across instruments. CI subjects with the most music experience were less susceptible to timbre effects, suggesting that music training may help less experienced CI users extract melodic pitch from a variety of sound sources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19062785      PMCID: PMC2668986          DOI: 10.1121/1.2961171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   2.482


  15 in total

1.  Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system.

Authors:  A E Vandali; L A Whitford; K L Plant; G M Clark
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Better place-coding of the fundamental frequency in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Luc Geurts; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effect of filter spacing on melody recognition: acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Kalyan Kasturi; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; R D Wolford; D K Eddington; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Melody recognition and musical interval perception by deaf subjects stimulated with electrical pulse trains through single cochlear implant electrodes.

Authors:  S Pijl; D W Schwarz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Perceptual scaling of synthesized musical timbres: common dimensions, specificities, and latent subject classes.

Authors:  S McAdams; S Winsberg; S Donnadieu; G De Soete; J Krimphoff
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1995

Review 8.  Music perception with cochlear implants: a review.

Authors:  Hugh J McDermott
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

9.  Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.

Authors:  Valerie Looi; Hugh McDermott; Colette McKay; Louise Hickson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Clinical assessment of music perception in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Grace L Nimmons; Robert S Kang; Ward R Drennan; Jeff Longnion; Chad Ruffin; Tina Worman; Bevan Yueh; Jay T Rubenstien
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  26 in total

1.  Influence of pitch, timbre and timing cues on melodic contour identification with a competing masker (L).

Authors:  Meimei Zhu; Bing Chen; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Improving melody recognition in cochlear implant recipients through individualized frequency map fitting.

Authors:  Walter Di Nardo; Alessandro Scorpecci; Sara Giannantonio; Francesca Cianfrone; Gaetano Paludetti
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Melodic contour identification and sentence recognition using sung speech.

Authors:  Joseph D Crew; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effect of a competing instrument on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Sandra I Oba
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effect of bandpass filtering on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Benefits of music training in mandarin-speaking pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin; Xiaosong Wang; Jiunn-Liang Wu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study of the Impact of Online Music Training on Pitch and Timbre Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Nicole T Jiam; Mickael L Deroche; Patpong Jiradejvong; Charles J Limb
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-02-27

8.  Channel interaction limits melodic pitch perception in simulated cochlear implants.

Authors:  Joseph D Crew; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Frequency change detection and speech perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Fawen Zhang; Gabrielle Underwood; Kelli McGuire; Chun Liang; David R Moore; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Melodic pitch perception and lexical tone perception in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Duoduo Tao; Rui Deng; Ye Jiang; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Bing Chen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.