Literature DB >> 19045656

Harmonic segregation through mistuning can improve fundamental frequency discrimination.

Joshua G W Bernstein1, Andrew J Oxenham.   

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between harmonic frequency resolution and fundamental frequency (f(0)) discrimination. Consistent with earlier studies, f(0) discrimination of a diotic bandpass-filtered harmonic complex deteriorated sharply as the f(0) decreased to the point where only harmonics above the tenth were presented. However, when the odd harmonics were mistuned by 3%, performance improved dramatically, such that performance nearly equaled that found with only even harmonics present. Mistuning also improved performance when alternating harmonics were presented to opposite ears (dichotic condition). In a task involving frequency discrimination of individual harmonics within the complexes, mistuning the odd harmonics yielded no significant improvement in the resolution of individual harmonics. Pitch matches to the mistuned complexes suggested that the even harmonics dominated the pitch for f(0)'s at which a benefit of mistuning was observed. The results suggest that f(0) discrimination performance can benefit from perceptual segregation based on inharmonicity, and that poor performance when only high-numbered harmonics are present is not due to limited peripheral harmonic resolvability. Taken together with earlier results, the findings suggest that f(0) discrimination may depend on auditory filter bandwidths, but that spectral resolution of individual harmonics is neither necessary nor sufficient for accurate f(0) discrimination.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19045656      PMCID: PMC2736713          DOI: 10.1121/1.2956484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  28 in total

1.  The lower limit of melodic pitch.

Authors:  D Pressnitzer; R D Patterson; K Krumbholz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The lower limit of pitch as determined by rate discrimination.

Authors:  K Krumbholz; R D Patterson; D Pressnitzer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea.

Authors:  B C Moore; M Huss; D A Vickers; B R Glasberg; J I Alcántara
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  2000-08

4.  Pitch discrimination of diotic and dichotic tone complexes: harmonic resolvability or harmonic number?

Authors:  Joshua G Bernstein; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Pitch, consonance, and harmony.

Authors:  E Terhardt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The pattern-transformation model of pitch.

Authors:  F L Wightman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  An optimum processor theory for the central formation of the pitch of complex tones.

Authors:  J L Goldstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Measurements of binaural echo suppression.

Authors:  P M Zurek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  A revised model of the inner-hair cell and auditory-nerve complex.

Authors:  Christian J Sumner; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda; Lowel P O'Mard; Ray Meddis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  14 in total

1.  Spectral processing of two concurrent harmonic complexes.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Pitch perception for mixtures of spectrally overlapping harmonic complex tones.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Michael V Keebler; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Musical intervals and relative pitch: frequency resolution, not interval resolution, is special.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Michael V Keebler; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Does fundamental-frequency discrimination measure virtual pitch discrimination?

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Kristin Divis; David M Wrobleski; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Can temporal fine structure represent the fundamental frequency of unresolved harmonics?

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christophe Micheyl; Michael V Keebler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Pitch discrimination with mixtures of three concurrent harmonic complexes.

Authors:  Jackson E Graves; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effect of lowest harmonic rank on fundamental-frequency difference limens varies with fundamental frequency.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Auditory stream segregation and the perception of across-frequency synchrony.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Cynthia Hunter; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 9.  Pitch, harmonicity and concurrent sound segregation: psychoacoustical and neurophysiological findings.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Effects of pulsing of a target tone on the ability to hear it out in different types of complex sounds.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Brian R Glasberg; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.