Literature DB >> 20968365

Does fundamental-frequency discrimination measure virtual pitch discrimination?

Christophe Micheyl1, Kristin Divis, David M Wrobleski, Andrew J Oxenham.   

Abstract

Studies of pitch perception often involve measuring difference limens for complex tones (DLCs) that differ in fundamental frequency (F0). These measures are thought to reflect F0 discrimination and to provide an indirect measure of subjective pitch strength. However, in many situations discrimination may be based on cues other than the pitch or the F0, such as differences in the frequencies of individual components or timbre (brightness). Here, DLCs were measured for harmonic and inharmonic tones under various conditions, including a randomized or fixed lowest harmonic number, with and without feedback. The inharmonic tones were produced by shifting the frequencies of all harmonics upwards by 6.25%, 12.5%, or 25% of F0. It was hypothesized that, if DLCs reflect residue-pitch discrimination, these frequency-shifted tones, which produced a weaker and more ambiguous pitch than would yield larger DLCs than the harmonic tones. However, if DLCs reflect comparisons of component pitches, or timbre, they should not be systematically influenced by frequency shifting. The results showed larger DLCs and more scattered pitch matches for inharmonic than for harmonic complexes, confirming that the inharmonic tones produced a less consistent pitch than the harmonic tones, and consistent with the idea that DLCs reflect F0 pitch discrimination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20968365      PMCID: PMC2981110          DOI: 10.1121/1.3478786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  29 in total

1.  Level discrimination of sinusoids as a function of duration and level for fixed-level, roving-level, and across-frequency conditions.

Authors:  A J Oxenham; S Buus
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Perceptual fusion and fragmentation of complex tones made inharmonic by applying different degrees of frequency shift and spectral stretch.

Authors:  B Roberts; J M Brunstrom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Pitch discrimination of diotic and dichotic tone complexes: harmonic resolvability or harmonic number?

Authors:  Joshua G Bernstein; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Residue pitch as a function of component spacing.

Authors:  R D Patterson; F L Wightman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The effects of relative phase and the number of components on residue pitch.

Authors:  R D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The pattern-transformation model of pitch.

Authors:  F L Wightman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  An optimum processor theory for the central formation of the pitch of complex tones.

Authors:  J L Goldstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Pitch perception of two-frequency stimuli.

Authors:  G F Smoorenburg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1970-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Verification of the optimal probabilistic basis of aural processing in pitch of complex tones.

Authors:  J L Goldstein; A Gerson; P Srulovicz; M Furst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  11 in total

1.  Further evidence that fundamental-frequency difference limens measure pitch discrimination.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Claire M Ryan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Time-dependent discrimination advantages for harmonic sounds suggest efficient coding for memory.

Authors:  Malinda J McPherson; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  On the possibility of a place code for the low pitch of high-frequency complex tones.

Authors:  Sébastien Santurette; Torsten Dau; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Temporal coherence versus harmonicity in auditory stream formation.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Heather Kreft; Shihab Shamma; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Superoptimal Perceptual Integration Suggests a Place-Based Representation of Pitch at High Frequencies.

Authors:  Bonnie K Lau; Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Effect of lowest harmonic rank on fundamental-frequency difference limens varies with fundamental frequency.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Complex pitch perception mechanisms are shared by humans and a New World monkey.

Authors:  Xindong Song; Michael S Osmanski; Yueqi Guo; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Separating the contributions of primary and unwanted cues in psychophysical studies.

Authors:  Huanping Dai; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Distortion products and their influence on representation of pitch-relevant information in the human brainstem for unresolved harmonic complex tones.

Authors:  Christopher J Smalt; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Gavin M Bidelman; Saradha Ananthakrishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Incongruent pitch cues are associated with increased activation and functional connectivity in the frontal areas.

Authors:  Jo-Fu Lotus Lin; Toshiaki Imada; Patricia K Kuhl; Fa-Hsuan Lin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.