Literature DB >> 20695716

Auditory stream segregation and the perception of across-frequency synchrony.

Christophe Micheyl1, Cynthia Hunter1, Andrew J Oxenham1.   

Abstract

This study explored the extent to which sequential auditory grouping affects the perception of temporal synchrony. In Experiment 1, listeners discriminated between 2 pairs of asynchronous "target" tones at different frequencies, A and B, in which the B tone either led or lagged. Thresholds were markedly higher when the target tones were temporally surrounded by "captor tones" at the A frequency than when the captor tones were absent or at a remote frequency. Experiment 2 extended these findings to asynchrony detection, revealing that the perception of synchrony, one of the most potent cues for simultaneous auditory grouping, is not immune to competing effects of sequential grouping. Experiment 3 examined the influence of ear separation on the interactions between sequential and simultaneous grouping cues. The results showed that, although ear separation could facilitate perceptual segregation and impair asynchrony detection, it did not prevent the perceptual integration of simultaneous sounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20695716      PMCID: PMC4315665          DOI: 10.1037/a0017601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  47 in total

1.  Influence of spatial and temporal coding on auditory gap detection.

Authors:  A J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Influence of peripheral resolvability on the perceptual segregation of harmonic complex tones differing in fundamental frequency.

Authors:  N Grimault; C Micheyl; R P Carlyon; P Arthaud; L Collet
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Stream segregation of narrow-band noise bursts.

Authors:  A S Bregman; P A Ahad; C Van Loon
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-07

4.  Effects of ear of entry and perceived location of synchronous and asynchronous components on mistuning detection.

Authors:  H Gockel; R P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Perceptual segregation of a harmonic from a vowel by interaural time difference and frequency proximity.

Authors:  C J Darwin; R W Hukin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Spatial and temporal properties of illusory contours and amodal boundary completion.

Authors:  D L Ringach; R Shapley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Comodulation masking release: is comodulation sufficient?

Authors:  J H Grose; J W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Primitive stream segregation of tone sequences without differences in fundamental frequency or passband.

Authors:  Brian Roberts; Brian R Glasberg; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  An evaluation of psychophysical models of auditory change perception.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Christian Kaernbach; Laurent Demany
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Effects of frequency disparities on trading of an ambiguous tone between two competing auditory objects.

Authors:  Adrian K C Lee; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  15 in total

1.  Perception of across-frequency asynchrony and the role of cochlear delays.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Jordan A Beim; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Neural correlates of auditory scene analysis and perception.

Authors:  Kate L Christison-Lagay; Adam M Gifford; Yale E Cohen
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  Neural correlates of auditory stream segregation: an analysis of onset- and change-related responses.

Authors:  Nicholas A Smith; Suyash Joshi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  An auditory illusion reveals the role of streaming in the temporal misallocation of perceptual objects.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Nori Jacoby; Ifat Yasin; Andrew J Oxenham; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Effects of temporal stimulus properties on the perception of across-frequency asynchrony.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Jordan A Beim; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Assessing the effects of temporal coherence on auditory stream formation through comodulation masking release.

Authors:  Simon Krogholt Christiansen; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The Perception of Multiple Simultaneous Pitches as a Function of Number of Spectral Channels and Spectral Spread in a Noise-Excited Envelope Vocoder.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Hao Lu; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-02-11

8.  Auditory stream segregation for alternating and synchronous tones.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Coral Hanson; Laurent Demany; Shihab Shamma; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 9.  Temporal coherence and attention in auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Shihab A Shamma; Mounya Elhilali; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 13.837

10.  Schema learning for the cocktail party problem.

Authors:  Kevin J P Woods; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.