Literature DB >> 11008818

The lower limit of pitch as determined by rate discrimination.

K Krumbholz1, R D Patterson, D Pressnitzer.   

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the lower limit of pitch for complex, harmonic sounds, like the notes produced by low-pitched musical instruments. The lower limit of pitch is investigated by measuring rate discrimination thresholds for harmonic tones filtered into 1.2-kHz-wide bands with a lower cutoff frequency, F(c), ranging from 0.2 to 6.4 kHz. When F(c) is below 1 kHz and the harmonics are in cosine phase, rate discrimination threshold exhibits a rapid, tenfold decrease as the repetition rate is increased from 16 to 64 Hz, and over this range, the perceptual quality of the stimuli changes from flutter to pitch. When F(c) is increased above 1 kHz, the slope of the transition from high to low thresholds becomes shallower and occurs at progressively higher rates. A quantitative comparison of the cosine-phase thresholds with subjective estimates of the existence region of pitch from the literature shows that the transition in rate discrimination occurs at approximately the same rate as the lower limit of pitch. The rate discrimination experiment was then repeated with alternating-phase harmonic tones whose envelopes repeat at twice the repetition rate of the waveform. In this case, when F(c) is below 1 kHz, the transition in rate discrimination is shifted downward by almost an octave relative to the transition in the cosine-phase thresholds. The results support the hypothesis that in the low-frequency region, the pitch limit is determined by a temporal mechanism, which analyzes time intervals between peaks in the neural activity pattern. It seems that temporal processing of pitch is limited to time intervals less than 33 ms, corresponding to a pitch limit of about 30 Hz.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11008818     DOI: 10.1121/1.1287843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  43 in total

1.  Shifting fundamental frequency in simulated electric-acoustic listening.

Authors:  Christopher A Brown; Nicole M Scherrer; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Coding of amplitude modulation in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Pingbo Yin; Jeffrey S Johnson; Kevin N O'Connor; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Representations of Time-Varying Cochlear Implant Stimulation in Auditory Cortex of Awake Marmosets (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Luke A Johnson; Charles C Della Santina; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Cortical representations of pitch in monkeys and humans.

Authors:  Daniel Bendor; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Harmonic segregation through mistuning can improve fundamental frequency discrimination.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Can temporal fine structure represent the fundamental frequency of unresolved harmonics?

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christophe Micheyl; Michael V Keebler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Neural coding of temporal information in auditory thalamus and cortex.

Authors:  X Wang; T Lu; D Bendor; E Bartlett
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Disruption of the auditory response to a regular click train by a single, extra click.

Authors:  Bernd Lütkenhöner; Roy D Patterson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Neural Processing of Acoustic and Electric Interaural Time Differences in Normal-Hearing Gerbils.

Authors:  Maike Vollmer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Reciprocal Interactions Between Audition and Touch in Flutter Frequency Perception.

Authors:  Silvia Convento; Kira A Wegner-Clemens; Jeffrey M Yau
Journal:  Multisens Res       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 2.286

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.