BACKGROUND: Greater thickness of the tissue extending laterally from the greater trochanter has been associated with a lower risk of hip fracture in women. The effect of trochanteric soft tissue thickness on the risk of incident hip fracture has not been evaluated in men. METHODS: We measured trochanteric soft tissue thickness by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for all incident hip fracture cases (n = 70) and 222 randomly selected noncases in older men (> or =65 yr) enrolled in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study. Differences in tissue thickness between cases and controls were examined. Changes in fall force and factor-of-risk (the ratio of force from a sideways fall to femoral bone strength) associated with tissue thickness were determined. The relative risk for incident hip fracture per SD decrease in tissue thickness was calculated. RESULTS: Mean trochanteric soft tissue thickness did not differ significantly between cases and noncases (29.1 +/- 11.9 vs 31.0 +/- 11.5 mm; P = 0.2). Although increased tissue thickness reduced both the estimates of fall force and the factor-of-risk, tissue thickness was not associated with the risk of hip fracture (age- and bone mineral density-adjusted relative risk per sd decrease in tissue thickness = 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-1.16). CONCLUSIONS: In this study of elderly community-dwelling men, we found no significant association between trochanteric soft tissue thickness and incident hip fracture. Trochanteric soft tissue thickness in these men was less than previously reported in older women and may explain the difference between these results and those reported in women.
BACKGROUND: Greater thickness of the tissue extending laterally from the greater trochanter has been associated with a lower risk of hip fracture in women. The effect of trochanteric soft tissue thickness on the risk of incident hip fracture has not been evaluated in men. METHODS: We measured trochanteric soft tissue thickness by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for all incident hip fracture cases (n = 70) and 222 randomly selected noncases in older men (> or =65 yr) enrolled in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study. Differences in tissue thickness between cases and controls were examined. Changes in fall force and factor-of-risk (the ratio of force from a sideways fall to femoral bone strength) associated with tissue thickness were determined. The relative risk for incident hip fracture per SD decrease in tissue thickness was calculated. RESULTS: Mean trochanteric soft tissue thickness did not differ significantly between cases and noncases (29.1 +/- 11.9 vs 31.0 +/- 11.5 mm; P = 0.2). Although increased tissue thickness reduced both the estimates of fall force and the factor-of-risk, tissue thickness was not associated with the risk of hip fracture (age- and bone mineral density-adjusted relative risk per sd decrease in tissue thickness = 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-1.16). CONCLUSIONS: In this study of elderly community-dwelling men, we found no significant association between trochanteric soft tissue thickness and incident hip fracture. Trochanteric soft tissue thickness in these men was less than previously reported in older women and may explain the difference between these results and those reported in women.
Authors: Russel Burge; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Daniel H Solomon; John B Wong; Alison King; Anna Tosteson Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: K Michaëlsson; E Weiderpass; B Y Farahmand; J A Baron; P G Persson; L Zidén; C Zetterberg; S Ljunghall Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 1999 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Mary L Bouxsein; Pawel Szulc; Fracoise Munoz; Erica Thrall; Elizabeth Sornay-Rendu; Pierre D Delmas Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Brent K Hoffmeister; P Luke Spinolo; Mark E Sellers; Peyton L Marshall; Ann M Viano; Sang-Rok Lee Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 1.840
Authors: Katherine Neubecker Bachmann; Pouneh K Fazeli; Elizabeth A Lawson; Brian M Russell; Ariana D Riccio; Erinne Meenaghan; Anu V Gerweck; Kamryn Eddy; Tara Holmes; Mark Goldstein; Thomas Weigel; Seda Ebrahimi; Diane Mickley; Suzanne Gleysteen; Miriam A Bredella; Anne Klibanski; Karen K Miller Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Alexander G Bruno; Kerry E Broe; Xiaochun Zhang; Elizabeth J Samelson; Ching-An Meng; Rajaram Manoharan; John D'Agostino; L Adrienne Cupples; Douglas P Kiel; Mary L Bouxsein Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Serghei Malkov; Peggy M Cawthon; Kathy Wilt Peters; Jane A Cauley; Rachel A Murphy; Marjolein Visser; Joseph P Wilson; Tamara Harris; Suzanne Satterfield; Steve Cummings; John A Shepherd Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: S N Robinovitch; S L Evans; J Minns; A C Laing; P Kannus; P A Cripton; S Derler; S J Birge; D Plant; I D Cameron; D P Kiel; J Howland; K Khan; J B Lauritzen Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2009-10-06 Impact factor: 4.507