Literature DB >> 19017753

Trochanteric soft tissue thickness and hip fracture in older men.

Carrie M Nielson1, Mary L Bouxsein, Sinara S Freitas, Kristine E Ensrud, Eric S Orwoll.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Greater thickness of the tissue extending laterally from the greater trochanter has been associated with a lower risk of hip fracture in women. The effect of trochanteric soft tissue thickness on the risk of incident hip fracture has not been evaluated in men.
METHODS: We measured trochanteric soft tissue thickness by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for all incident hip fracture cases (n = 70) and 222 randomly selected noncases in older men (> or =65 yr) enrolled in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study. Differences in tissue thickness between cases and controls were examined. Changes in fall force and factor-of-risk (the ratio of force from a sideways fall to femoral bone strength) associated with tissue thickness were determined. The relative risk for incident hip fracture per SD decrease in tissue thickness was calculated.
RESULTS: Mean trochanteric soft tissue thickness did not differ significantly between cases and noncases (29.1 +/- 11.9 vs 31.0 +/- 11.5 mm; P = 0.2). Although increased tissue thickness reduced both the estimates of fall force and the factor-of-risk, tissue thickness was not associated with the risk of hip fracture (age- and bone mineral density-adjusted relative risk per sd decrease in tissue thickness = 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-1.16).
CONCLUSIONS: In this study of elderly community-dwelling men, we found no significant association between trochanteric soft tissue thickness and incident hip fracture. Trochanteric soft tissue thickness in these men was less than previously reported in older women and may explain the difference between these results and those reported in women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19017753      PMCID: PMC2646514          DOI: 10.1210/jc.2008-1640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  20 in total

1.  Prediction of femoral impact forces in falls on the hip.

Authors:  S N Robinovitch; W C Hayes; T A McMahon
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 2.  Biomechanics of fracture risk prediction of the hip and spine by quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  W C Hayes; S J Piazza; P K Zysset
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025.

Authors:  Russel Burge; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Daniel H Solomon; John B Wong; Alison King; Anna Tosteson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  A hypothesis: the causes of hip fractures.

Authors:  S R Cummings; M C Nevitt
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1989-07

5.  Femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures have different risk factors: a prospective study.

Authors:  K M Fox; S R Cummings; E Williams; K Stone
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Differences in risk factor patterns between cervical and trochanteric hip fractures. Swedish Hip Fracture Study Group.

Authors:  K Michaëlsson; E Weiderpass; B Y Farahmand; J A Baron; P G Persson; L Zidén; C Zetterberg; S Ljunghall
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Steven R Cummings; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-05-18       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Contribution of trochanteric soft tissues to fall force estimates, the factor of risk, and prediction of hip fracture risk.

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein; Pawel Szulc; Fracoise Munoz; Erica Thrall; Elizabeth Sornay-Rendu; Pierre D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Impact near the hip dominates fracture risk in elderly nursing home residents who fall.

Authors:  W C Hayes; E R Myers; J N Morris; T N Gerhart; H S Yett; L A Lipsitz
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Read my hips: measuring trochanteric soft tissue thickness.

Authors:  L A Maitland; E R Myers; J A Hipp; W C Hayes; S L Greenspan
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.333

View more
  23 in total

1.  Effect of intervening tissues on ultrasonic backscatter measurements of bone: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Brent K Hoffmeister; P Luke Spinolo; Mark E Sellers; Peyton L Marshall; Ann M Viano; Sang-Rok Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Comparison of hip geometry, strength, and estimated fracture risk in women with anorexia nervosa and overweight/obese women.

Authors:  Katherine Neubecker Bachmann; Pouneh K Fazeli; Elizabeth A Lawson; Brian M Russell; Ariana D Riccio; Erinne Meenaghan; Anu V Gerweck; Kamryn Eddy; Tara Holmes; Mark Goldstein; Thomas Weigel; Seda Ebrahimi; Diane Mickley; Suzanne Gleysteen; Miriam A Bredella; Anne Klibanski; Karen K Miller
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 3.  Sideways fall-induced impact force and its effect on hip fracture risk: a review.

Authors:  M Nasiri Sarvi; Y Luo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Exercise, muscle, and the applied load-bone strength balance.

Authors:  L Giangregorio; R El-Kotob
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  The factor-of-risk biomechanical approach predicts hip fracture in men and women: the Framingham Study.

Authors:  A B Dufour; B Roberts; K E Broe; D P Kiel; M L Bouxsein; M T Hannan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Adiposity and bone microarchitecture in the GLOW study.

Authors:  A E Litwic; L D Westbury; K Ward; C Cooper; E M Dennison
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Vertebral size, bone density, and strength in men and women matched for age and areal spine BMD.

Authors:  Alexander G Bruno; Kerry E Broe; Xiaochun Zhang; Elizabeth J Samelson; Ching-An Meng; Rajaram Manoharan; John D'Agostino; L Adrienne Cupples; Douglas P Kiel; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Hip Fractures Risk in Older Men and Women Associated With DXA-Derived Measures of Thigh Subcutaneous Fat Thickness, Cross-Sectional Muscle Area, and Muscle Density.

Authors:  Serghei Malkov; Peggy M Cawthon; Kathy Wilt Peters; Jane A Cauley; Rachel A Murphy; Marjolein Visser; Joseph P Wilson; Tamara Harris; Suzanne Satterfield; Steve Cummings; John A Shepherd
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Hip fracture epidemiological trends, outcomes, and risk factors, 1970-2009.

Authors:  Ray Marks
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2010-04-08

10.  Hip protectors: recommendations for biomechanical testing--an international consensus statement (part I).

Authors:  S N Robinovitch; S L Evans; J Minns; A C Laing; P Kannus; P A Cripton; S Derler; S J Birge; D Plant; I D Cameron; D P Kiel; J Howland; K Khan; J B Lauritzen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.