Literature DB >> 17144789

Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025.

Russel Burge1, Bess Dawson-Hughes, Daniel H Solomon, John B Wong, Alison King, Anna Tosteson.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This study predicts the burden of incident osteoporosis-related fractures and costs in the United States, by sex, age group, race/ethnicity, and fracture type, from 2005 to 2025. Total fractures were >2 million, costing nearly $17 billion in 2005. Men account for >25% of the burden. Rapid growth in the disease burden is projected among nonwhite populations.
INTRODUCTION: The aging of the U.S. population will likely lead to greater prevalence of osteoporosis. Policy makers require precise projections of the disease burden by demographic subgroups and skeletal sites to effectively target osteoporosis intervention and treatment programs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A state transition Markov decision model was used to estimate total incident fractures and costs by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and skeletal site for the U.S. population 50 years of age for 2005-2025.
RESULTS: More than 2 million incident fractures at a cost of $17 billion are predicted for 2005. Total costs including prevalent fractures are more than $19 billion. Men account for 29% of fractures and 25% of costs. Total incident fractures by skeletal site were vertebral (27%), wrist (19%), hip (14%), pelvic (7%), and other (33%). Total costs by fracture type were vertebral (6%), hip (72%), wrist (3%), pelvic (5%), and other (14%). By 2025, annual fractures and costs are projected to rise by almost 50%. The most rapid growth is estimated for people 65-74 years of age, with an increase>87%. An increase of nearly 175% is projected for Hispanic and other subpopulations.
CONCLUSIONS: Osteoporosis prevention, treatment, and education efforts should address all skeletal sites, not just hip and vertebral, and appropriate attention is warranted for men and diverse race/ethnicity subgroups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17144789     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.061113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  1294 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of anti-osteoporotic drugs to prevent secondary fragility fractures: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  T Saito; J M Sterbenz; S Malay; L Zhong; M P MacEachern; K C Chung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Preoperative factors and early complications associated with hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Christopher P Miller; Rafael A Buerba; Michael P Leslie
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2014-06

3.  Cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Smita Nayak; Mark S Roberts; Susan L Greenspan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Adherence to osteoporosis drugs and fracture prevention: no evidence of healthy adherer bias in a frail cohort of seniors.

Authors:  S M Cadarette; D H Solomon; J N Katz; A R Patrick; M A Brookhart
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Higher Dairy Intakes Are Associated with Higher Bone Mineral Density among Adults with Sufficient Vitamin D Status: Results from the Boston Puerto Rican Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  Kelsey M Mangano; Sabrina E Noel; Shivani Sahni; Katherine L Tucker
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  Homocysteine levels and risk of hip fracture in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Meryl S Leboff; Rupali Narweker; Andrea LaCroix; Lieling Wu; Rebecca Jackson; Jennifer Lee; Douglas C Bauer; Jane Cauley; Charles Kooperberg; Cora Lewis; Asha M Thomas; Steven Cummings
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Body mass index and risk of adverse cardiac events in elderly patients with hip fracture: a population-based study.

Authors:  John A Batsis; Jeanne M Huddleston; L Joseph Melton; Paul M Huddleston; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez; Dirk R Larson; Rachel E Gullerud; M Molly McMahon
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Self-perception of fracture risk: what can it tell us?

Authors:  A E Litwic; J E Compston; A Wyman; E S Siris; S H Gehlbach; J D Adachi; R Chapurlat; A Díez-Pérez; A Z LaCroix; J W Nieves; J C Netelenbos; J Pfeilschifter; M Rossini; C Roux; K G Saag; S Silverman; N B Watts; S L Greenspan; L March; C L Gregson; C Cooper; E M Dennison
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Quality health care gaps in osteoporosis: how can patients, providers, and the health system do a better job?

Authors:  Gim Gee Teng; Jeffrey R Curtis; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.096

10.  Mechanical Loading Promotes the Expansion of Primitive Osteoprogenitors and Organizes Matrix and Vascular Morphology in Long Bone Defects.

Authors:  Chao Liu; Pamela Cabahug-Zuckerman; Christopher Stubbs; Martin Pendola; Cinyee Cai; Kenneth A Mann; Alesha B Castillo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.